首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology >A Systematic Approach to Review of in vitro Methods in Brain Tumour Research (SAToRI-BTR): Development of a Preliminary Checklist for Evaluating Quality and Human Relevance
【24h】

A Systematic Approach to Review of in vitro Methods in Brain Tumour Research (SAToRI-BTR): Development of a Preliminary Checklist for Evaluating Quality and Human Relevance

机译:一种探讨脑肿瘤研究中体外方法的系统方法(Satori-BTR):评估质量和人类相关性的初步清单的发展

获取原文
       

摘要

Background - A wide range of human in vitro methods have been developed and there is considerable interest in the potential of these studies to address questions related to clinical (human) use of drugs, and the pathobiology of tumours. This requires agreement on how to assess the strength of evidence available (i.e. quality and quantity) and the human-relevance of such studies. The SAToRI-BTR (Systematic Approach To Review of In vitro methods in Brain Tumour Research) project seeks to identify relevant appraisal criteria to aid planning and/or evaluation of brain tumour studies using in vitro methods. Objectives – To identify criteria for evaluation of quality and human relevance of in vitro brain tumour studies; to assess the general acceptability of such criteria to senior scientists working within the field. Methods – Stage one involved identification of potential criteria for evaluation of in vitro studies through: (1) an international survey of brain tumour researchers; (2) interviews with scientists, clinicians, regulators, and journal editors; (3) analysis of relevant reports, documents, and published studies. Through content analysis of findings, an initial list of criteria for quality appraisal of in vitro studies of brain tumours was developed. Stage two involved review of the criteria by an expert panel (Delphi process). Results – Results of stage one indicated that methods for and quality of review of in vitro studies are highly variable, and that improved reporting standards are needed. 129 preliminary criteria were identified; duplicate and highly context-specific items were removed, resulting in 48 criteria for review by the expert (Delphi) panel. 37 criteria reached agreement, resulting in a provisional checklist for appraisal of in vitro studies in brain tumour research. Conclusion – Through a systematic process of collating assessment criteria and subjecting these to expert review, SAToRI-BTR has resulted in preliminary guidance for appraisal of in vitro brain tumour studies. Further development of this guidance, including investigating strategies for adaptation and dissemination across different sub-fields of brain tumour research, as well as the wider in vitro field, is planned.
机译:背景 - 已经开发了广泛的人体外方法,并且对这些研究的潜力有相当兴趣,以解决与临床(人类)使用药物的问题以及肿瘤的病症生物学。这需要协议如何评估可获得的证据强度(即质量和数量)和此类研究的人为相关性。 Satori-BTR(脑肿瘤研究中的体外方法的系统方法)旨在确定相关评估标准,以援助培训和/或使用体外方法评估脑肿瘤研究。目标 - 识别体外脑肿瘤研究质量和人类相关性评估标准;评估在领域工作的高级科学家此类标准的一般可接受性。方法 - 通过:(1)脑肿瘤研究人员的国际调查,阶段逐步识别潜在标准,用于评估体外研究的潜在标准; (2)对科学家,临床医生,监管机构和期刊编辑的访谈; (3)分析相关报告,文件和公布的研究。通过对调查结果分析,开发了脑肿瘤体外研究质量评估标准的初始标准。第二阶段参与了专家小组(Delphi Process)的标准审查。结果 - 阶段的结果表明,体外研究的审查方法和质量是高度变化的,并且需要改进的报告标准。 129确定了初步标准;删除了重复和高度上下文的项目,由专家(Delphi)小组进行审查48条标准。 37标准达成协议,达到脑肿瘤研究中的体外研究的临时清单。结论 - 通过对评估标准进行系统的系统过程,并对这些专家审查进行,因此Satori-BTR导致了对体外脑肿瘤研究评估的初步指导。计划进一步制定这一指导,包括调查脑肿瘤研究的不同子场的适应和传播的策略,以及更广泛的体外场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号