...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Immunology >Toll-Like Receptor Activation in Immunity vs. Tolerance
【24h】

Toll-Like Receptor Activation in Immunity vs. Tolerance

机译:免疫抗扰度与耐受性

获取原文
           

摘要

After the discovery of Toll-like receptors (TLR) in the late 1990s, initial investigations were focused on understanding their role, stimulating immune responses against infectious agents. Yet, the human body is home to a myriad of TLR agonistic bacteria that have not only established symbiosis with the immune system but also likely contribute to the induction and maintenance of immune homeostasis by dampening immune responses. In fact, stimulation of TLRs might be critically involved in this process and ultimately contribute to preventing development of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. Sander De Kivit and colleagues present an overview of those aspects, notably outlining the role of gut epithelial TLRs in the induction of immunity and the maintenance of tolerance ( 1 ). In addition, the authors highlight the mechanisms through which the gut microbiota regulates intestinal immune responses through interaction with TLRs. The capacity of probiotic microorganisms to modulate immunity via specific TLRs is further discussed in two articles by Julio Villena and Haruki Kitazawa. The authors explore the role of TLR interaction with immunobiotics for the regulation of intestinal inflammation in pigs, with a focus on TLR4 and Lactobacillus jensenii TL2937 ( 2 ). Interaction of probiotics with TLR3 to promote beneficial immunity beyond the gut in the respiratory tract is also examined ( 3 ). Specifically, inflammatory and immunoregulatory mechanisms conferred by Lactobacillus rhamnosus CRL1505 are presented along with their proposed effects increasing resistance to RSV infection while limiting immunopathology.While TLRs stimulate and regulate immunity against infectious agents, they are also highly pursued targets for therapy of cancer due to their strong ability to activate multiple arms of the immune system, and in particular to stimulate those specific cellular and cytokine responses critical to anti-tumor immunity. However, the immune potentiating, anti-tumor effects of TLR agonists may be restrained by their parallel ability to trigger immune regulation. Dampening of immune responses may enable control of inflammatory damage or immunopathology, but the downside is a limiting effect on efficacy. The impact of this dichotomy on the use of TLR agonists for immunotherapy of cancer is discussed by Hailing Lu in a review article where key immune regulatory facets of TLR agonists are presented, which may impair their efficacy ( 4 ). The dual role of TLRs in cancer likely extends beyond the dichotomy between immune stimulation and regulation. Inflammatory processes triggered by TLR engagement may notably constitute a double-edged sword in elimination vs. development of tumors. In that regard, Erin Burns and Nabiha Yusuf contribute two opinion articles discussing TLR targeting for the treatment of cancer. The use of TLR agonists for skin cancer treatment is presented in the context of their impact on skin carcinogenesis, and the question of TLR tolerance is also discussed ( 5 ). Similarly, the dual effect of TLR agonists in breast cancer is examined, where TLR stimulation might beneficially activate the immune system but inflammatory processes may also promote tumor development, while TLR-conferred immune regulation may further curb anti-tumor immunity ( 6 ).The mechanisms that underlie the immune regulatory properties of TLRs are not well understood. It is possible that the “default” response induced by TLR stimulation may vary between cell types, or depending on the microenvironment/anatomical location of TLR-expressing cells (as exemplified in gut mucosal tissue). Alexandra Zanin-Zhorov and colleagues described an immune regulatory mechanism conferred by TLR expression on T cells, which the authors review herein and discuss in the context of TLR-induced T cell effector functions ( 7 ). The role played by endogenous TLR ligands in conferring immune regulatory mechanisms is also presented. Nobuhiro Nakamoto and Takanori Kanai focus on a key organ, the liver, where various types of TLR-expressing cells are faced with continuous exposure to foreign antigens ( 8 ). The authors review immune stimulatory and regulatory effects of TLR signaling that coexist in the liver and influence liver health and disease. Elke Gülden and Li Wen concentrate on another organ, the pancreas, where TLR engagement also ultimately controls health and disease ( 9 ). Here, the beneficial and detrimental effects of TLR stimulation on type-1 diabetes are discussed, and notably the authors explore how endogenous TLR agonists can confer immune activation vs. regulation of autoreactive T cells. To close on the question of immune regulation conferred by TLRs, Himanshu Singh Chandel and colleagues contribute an opinion article investigating an alternative immune modulatory aspect that may influence the outcome of parasitic infection ( 10 ). The authors review mechanisms that underlie cross-talk between TLRs and CD40, and discuss how this interaction
机译:在20世纪90年代后期发现收费的受体(TLR)后,初步调查旨在了解其作用,刺激对传染病的免疫反应。然而,人体是一种无数的TLR激动细菌的所在地,该细菌不仅与免疫系统建立了共生,而且可能通过阻尼免疫反应来促进免疫稳态的诱导和维持。事实上,TLR的刺激可能批判性地参与了该过程,最终有助于预防炎症和自身免疫疾病的发展。 Sander de Kivit和同事概述了这些方面,特别是概述了肠上皮TLRS在诱导免疫和耐受性的诱导中的作用(1)。此外,作者还突出了通过与TLR的相互作用来调节肠道免疫反应的机制。益生菌微生物通过特异性TLR调节免疫的能力在Julio Villena和Haruki Kitazawa的两个文章中进一步讨论。作者探讨了TLR相互作用与免疫生物学的作用,用于治疗猪的肠炎,重点是TLR4和乳杆菌Jensenii TL2937(2)。还研究了益生菌与TLR3促进呼吸道中肠道之外的有益免疫的相互作用(3)。具体而言,乳酸杆菌CRL1505赋予的炎症和免疫调节机制随着其提出的影响,其提出的效应在限制免疫病理学的同时增加对RSV感染的抗性。刺激和调节对传染性药物的免疫力,它们也是由于他们的癌症治疗的靶向靶标。激活免疫系统多臂的强能力,特别是刺激对抗肿瘤免疫至关重要的特定细胞和细胞因子反应。然而,免疫增强,TLR激动剂的抗肿瘤作用可以通过它们的平行触发免疫调节的能力来抑制。免疫应答的抑制可以控制炎症损伤或免疫病理学,但下行是对疗效的限制影响。在审查文章中讨论了这种二分法对使用TLR激动剂进行癌症的癌症的免疫治疗的影响,其中提出了TLR激动剂的关键免疫调节小平面,这可能会损害它们的疗效(4)。 TLR在癌症中的双重作用可能延伸到免疫刺激和调节之间的二分法。由TLR接合引发的炎症过程可能尤其构成消除肿瘤的萌发中的双刃剑。在这方面,Erin Burns和Nabiha Yusuf贡献了两个讨论TLR靶向治疗癌症的文章。在它们对皮肤致癌物的影响的背景下介绍了用于皮肤癌的TLR激动剂,还讨论了TLR耐受性的问题(5)。同样,检查TLR激动剂在乳腺癌中的双重影响,其中TLR刺激可能有利地激活免疫系统,但炎症过程也可能促进肿瘤发育,而TLR赋予的免疫调节可能进一步抑制抗肿瘤免疫(6)。提出了TLRS的免疫调节性质的机制尚不清楚。 TLR刺激引起的“默认”响应可能在细胞类型之间变化,或者取决于表达TLR表达细胞的微环境/解剖定位(如在肠道组织中的例子中举例说明)。亚历山德拉Zanin-Zhorov及其同事描述了通过TLR表达在T细胞上赋予的免疫调节机制,该作者在此审查本文并在TLR诱导的T细胞效应函数(7)中讨论。还提出了内源性TLR配体在赋予免疫调节机制的作用。 Nobuhiro Nakamoto和Takanori Kanai关注一个关键器官,肝脏,其中各种类型的TLR表达细胞面临着连续暴露于外国抗原(8)。作者审查了TLR信令的免疫刺激和监管效应在肝脏中共存并影响肝脏健康和疾病。 ElkeGülden和李文集中在另一个器官上,胰腺,TLR参与也最终控制健康和疾病(9)。在此,讨论了TLR刺激对1型糖尿病的有益和不利影响,并且尤其是作者探讨了如何源性TLR激动剂如何赋予免疫激活与自动反应性T细胞的调节。为了结束由TLRS赋予的免疫调节问题,Himanshu Singh Chandel及其同事贡献了调查替代免疫调节方面的意见文章,可能影响寄生虫感染的结果(10)。作者审查了在TLRS和CD40之间串扰的机制,并讨论这种互动方式

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号