...
首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Immunology >Editorial: The Metabolic Challenges of Immune Cells in Health and Disease
【24h】

Editorial: The Metabolic Challenges of Immune Cells in Health and Disease

机译:社论:免疫细胞在健康和疾病中的代谢挑战

获取原文
           

摘要

Only few years ago, scientists had to struggle to convince audiences and editors that cell metabolism and biochemistry were not boring, let alone persuade the scientific community that alterations of the metabolic machinery could underpin human diseases ( 1 ). We hear from more senior scientists (we were only undergraduate students at the time, more often than not dreading our studies of glycolysis, Krebs cycle, electron transport chain, etc., on the “famous” Lehninger text-book) that publishing the first paper on c-Myc-mediated transcriptional control of the metabolic enzyme lactate dehydrogenase as a key mechanism for cancer transformation ( 2 ) or lymphocyte survival and activation via TCR-dependent regulation of nutrient uptake and utilization ( 3 , 4 ) was not easy at all. Indeed, they had to overcome the preconception of a well-established scientific community that, for the last few decades, had believed in the supremacy of molecular biology and genetics as experimental tools for understanding cellular mechanisms and disease processes.In 2015, metabolism is the heart of an ever growing body of studies, spanning the fields of cancer, stem cells, and, as highlighted in this series of review articles, immunology and metabolic diseases. This unexpected renaissance in the field of metabolism stands on the shoulders of giants. Indeed, scientists of the caliber of Warburg, Krebs, and Mitchell, just to name a few, spent their entire lives exploring the intricacies of cell metabolism. Not only had they elucidated the pathways for utilization of glucose and other nutrients for the generation of ATP but had also initiated the modern and fashionable concept of integration of metabolic processes with diseases and immune-regulation. As described by Nagy and Haschemi ( 5 ), Kempner and Peschel proposed the idea of a tight link between metabolism and inflammation, the modern so-called immunometabolism, as far back as 1930s. Unfortunately, the whole field of metabolism was relegated to the margins of modern research for long time, being considered irrelevant for addressing more important questions, such as how proliferation, differentiation, and cell death, are regulated in the cell. This obnubilation lasted until the realization that all these processes have distinct metabolic requirements and that impairing metabolism could perturb them. We now know that signaling pathways directly control specific metabolic pathways and enzymes, and vice versa, and even more astonishingly, that intermediates of metabolism, such as lactate or succinate, or metabolic enzymes (i.e., GAPDH or PFKFB3) can regulate gene expression, protein translation, or indeed entire processes, such as endothelial sprouting.The studies on immunometabolism that we present here encompass both cellular and systemic aspects of disease. At a cellular level, immunometabolism studies show how intracellular metabolic pathways activated downstream of growth factors and cytokines control immune cell functions. On an organismal level, immunometabolism investigates how immune cells regulate the homeostasis of metabolic tissues and how they contribute to the process of metabolic diseases, including obesity and type II diabetes. This collection contains 10 review articles that cover important and emerging aspects in both of these branches of immunometabolism.At the cellular level, Howie et al. ( 6 ) focus on the mechanisms of nutrient sensing in T cells and how these integrate with TCR and cytokine signals via the mTOR pathway to determine distinct differentiation pathways toward effector or regulatory T cell (Treg) subsets. Going deeper into the biology of Treg lymphocytes, Coe et al. ( 7 ) describe recent findings on the unique metabolic needs of Treg as compared to effector T cells (Teff), with a particular focus on mTOR-mediated control of metabolism in these T cell subsets. Schurich and Henson ( 8 ) discuss the emerging view that as a consequence of viral infection and antigenic load, CD8~(+)T cells can become senescent or exhausted. These are distinct fates of a T cell, sustained by different metabolic programs, which in turn dictate opposing outcomes during immune responses. Nagy and Haschemi ( 5 ) illustrate the metabolic changes that take place in macrophages upon LPS-induced activation and polarization. They then focus on how the pentose phosphate pathway is regulated during LPS- versus IL-4-induced polarization of macrophages and may be of importance in the provision of both nucleotide precursors and redox-equivalents determining different cell fates and types of immune response. Finally, Jones and Bianchi ( 9 ) give an overview of some recent key examples of metabolic control of biological processes beyond cellular proliferation. In particular, the roles of intermediates of metabolism in the control of gene expression, of metabolic enzymes in the regulation of protein translation and cellular differentiation, and of aerobic glycolysis in epigenetic dete
机译:只有几年前,科学家不得不努力说服观众和编辑细胞新陈代谢和生物化学并不无聊,更不用说说服科学界,代谢机制的改变可以支持人类疾病(1)。我们听到更多高级科学家(我们当时只有本科生,而不是害怕我们对糖酵解,克雷斯循环,电子传输链等的研究,就是发布第一个的“着名的”Lehninger Text-Book)。 C-MYC介导的纸张丙烷酶乳酸脱氢酶作为癌症转化的关键机制(2)或淋巴细胞存活和通过TCR依赖性调节的营养吸收和利用率(3,4)并不容易。事实上,他们必须克服一个完善的科学界的先注,这在过去的几十年里,据信是为了了解细胞机制和疾病过程的实验工具。2015年,新陈代谢是在这一系列审查文章,免疫学和代谢疾病中突出的癌症,干细胞的田间,跨越癌症,干细胞的田间的核心。在新陈代谢领域的这种意外的复兴站在巨人的肩膀上。实际上,Warburg,Krebs和Mitchell的口径的科学家只是为了命名几个,整个生命都花了探索细胞新陈代谢的复杂性。它们不仅阐明了利用葡萄糖和其他营养素的途径,而且还发起了与疾病和免疫调节的代谢过程的现代和时尚概念。如Nagy和Haschemi(5)所描述的,Kempner和Peschel提出了代谢与炎症之间的紧张联系的想法,现代所谓的免疫素质是20世纪30年代。不幸的是,整个新陈代谢领域被降级到了长期现代研究的边缘,被认为对解决更重要的问题无关紧要,例如如何在细胞中调节如何增殖,分化和细胞死亡。这种僵局持续直到明确所有这些过程都具有不同的代谢要求,并且损害的新陈代谢可能会扰乱它们。我们现在知道信号传导途径直接控制特定的代谢途径和酶,反之亦然,甚至更令人惊讶地,即代谢的中间体,例如乳酸或琥珀酸盐,或代谢酶(即,GAPDH或PFKFB3)可以调节基因表达,蛋白质翻译,或实际上整个过程,如内皮发芽。我们在这里呈现的免疫素质主义的研究包括疾病的细胞和系统性方面。在细胞水平下,免疫素质研究表明,在生长因子和细胞因子对照免疫细胞功能下如何激活细胞内代谢途径。在有机体水平上,免疫素质研究免疫细胞如何调节代谢组织的稳态以及它们如何促进代谢疾病的过程,包括肥胖和II型糖尿病。该系列包含10条审查文章,其在免疫素描的这些分支中涵盖重要和新兴方面。蜂窝水平,Howie等人。 (6)专注于T细胞中营养素感测的机制以及这些途径通过MTOR途径与TCR和细胞因子信号集成,以确定朝向效应器或调节T细胞(Treg)子集的不同分化途径。进入Treg淋巴细胞的生物学,Coe等人。 (7)与效应T细胞(TEFF)相比,描述Treg的独特代谢需求的最近发现,特别关注这些T细胞亚群中的MTOR介导的代谢控制。 Schurich和Henson(8)讨论了作为病毒感染和抗原载荷的结果,CD8〜(+)T细胞可以变为衰老或耗尽。这些是T细胞的明显束缚,由不同的代谢程序持续,这反过来在免疫反应期间决定相反的结果。 NAGY和HASCHEMI(5)说明了在LPS诱导的激活和极化上发生巨噬细胞的代谢变化。然后,它们专注于在巨噬细胞的LPS - 与IL-4诱导的极化期间如何调节戊糖磷酸盐途径,并且在提供核苷酸前体和氧化还原等同物中确定不同细胞率和免疫应答类型的重要性。最后,琼斯和比安奇(9)概述了除细胞增殖之外的生物过程代谢控制的一些关键实例。特别地,代谢中间体中间体在基因表达中的控制中的作用,代谢酶在调节蛋白质翻译和细胞分化中,以及表观遗传斑的有氧糖溶解

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号