首页> 外文期刊>Fluids >Fast Models of Hydrocarbon Migration Paths and Pressure Depletion Based on Complex Analysis Methods (CAM): Mini-Review and Verification
【24h】

Fast Models of Hydrocarbon Migration Paths and Pressure Depletion Based on Complex Analysis Methods (CAM): Mini-Review and Verification

机译:基于复杂分析方法的烃迁移路径和压力消耗的快速模型(CAM):迷你审查和验证

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

A recently developed code to model hydrocarbon migration and convective time of flight makes use of complex analysis methods (CAM) paired with Eulerian particle tracking. Because the method uses new algorithms that are uniquely developed by our research group, validation of the fast CAM solutions with independent methods is merited. Particle path solutions were compared with independent solutions methods (Eclipse). These prior and new benchmarks are briefly summarized here to further verify the results obtained with CAM codes. Pressure field solutions based on CAM are compared with independent embedded discrete fracture method (EDFM) solutions. The CAM method is particularly attractive because its grid-less nature offers fast computation times and unlimited resolution. The method is particularly well suited for solving a variety of practical field development problems. Examples are given for fast optimization of waterflood patterns. Another successful application area is the modeling of fluid withdrawal patterns in hydraulically fractured wells. Because no gridding is required, the CAM model can compute the evolution of the drained rock volume (DRV) for an unlimited (but finite) number of both hydraulic and natural fractures. Such computations of the DRV are based on the convective time of flight and show the fluid withdrawal zone in the reservoir. In contrast, pressure depletion models are based on the diffusive time of flight. In ultra-low permeability reservoirs, the pressure depletion zones do not correspond to the DRV, because the convective and diffusive displacement rates differ over an order of magnitude (diffusive time of flight being the fastest). Therefore, pressure depletion models vastly overestimate the drained volume in shale reservoirs, which is why fracture and well spacing decisions should be based on both pressure depletion and DRV models, not pressure only.
机译:最近开发的用于模型的碳氢化合物迁移和对流飞行时间的代码利用复杂的分析方法(CAM)与欧拉粒子跟踪配对。由于该方法使用我们的研究组独特开发的新算法,因此合理了具有独立方法的快速凸轮解决方案的验证。将粒径溶液与独立溶液方法(Eclipse)进行比较。这里简要概述了这些先前和新的基准,以进一步验证使用凸轮码获得的结果。将基于凸轮的压力场解决方案与独立的嵌入离散断裂方法(EDFM)解决方案进行比较。 CAM方法特别有吸引力,因为其网格性质提供快速计算时间和无限分辨率。该方法特别适用于解决各种实际现场发育问题。给出了水泡模式的快速优化的例子。另一个成功的应用领域是液压骨折井中的流体取出图案的建模。因为不需要网格,所以凸轮模型可以计算液压和自然骨折的无限(但有限)次数的排出的摇滚音量(DRV)的演变。 DRV的这种计算基于飞行的对流时间,并显示储存器中的流体抽出区。相比之下,压力耗尽模型基于漫射飞行时间。在超低渗透储存器中,压力耗尽区与DRV不对应,因为对流和扩散位移率在数量级(扩散飞行时间最快)不同。因此,压力耗尽模型大大高估了页岩储层中的排水量,这就是为什么骨折和井间距决定应基于压力耗尽和DRV模型,而不是压力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号