...
首页> 外文期刊>Gynecologic Oncology Reports >Lumbee Native American ancestry and the incidence of aggressive histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer
【24h】

Lumbee Native American ancestry and the incidence of aggressive histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer

机译:腰母本土血症和子宫内膜癌侵袭性组织学亚型的发病率

获取原文

摘要

Objective The Lumbee Indian tribe is the largest Native American tribe in North Carolina, with about 55,000 enrolled members who mostly reside in southeastern counties. We evaluated whether Lumbee heritage is associated with high-risk histologic subtypes of endometrial cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the available records from IRB-approved endometrial cancer databases at two institutions of patients of Lumbee descent (year of diagnosis range 1980–2014). Each Lumbee case was matched by age, year of diagnosis, and BMI to two non-Lumbee controls. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical associations. Kaplan–Meier methods and log-rank test were used to display and compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to adjust for age and BMI while testing cohort as a predictor of DFS and OS. Results Among 108 subjects, 10/35 (29%) Lumbee and 19/72 (26%) non-Lumbee subjects had high-risk (serous/clear cell/carcinosarcoma) histologic types ( p = 0.8). 12/35 (34%) Lumbee and 24/72 (33%) non-Lumbee subjects had grade 3 tumors ( p = 0.9). 5/33 (15%) Lumbee and 13/72 (18%) non-Lumbee had advanced stage endometrial cancer at diagnosis ( p = 0.7). Lumbee ancestry was not associated with worse survival outcomes. OS ( p = 0.054) and DFS ( p = 0.01) were both worse in Blacks compared to Lumbee and White subjects. Conclusion In this retrospective cohort analysis, Lumbee Native American ancestry was not a significant independent predictor of rates of high-risk histological subtypes of endometrial cancer or poor survival outcomes. Highlights ? In a retrospective cohort study, women with endometrial cancer of Lumbee Native American ancestry were matched to non-Native American controls. ? Women with Native American ancestry did not have a significantly higher incidence of high-risk histologic type when compared to controls. ? Disease-free survival and overall survival were lower in Black subjects compared to White and Native American subjects.
机译:目标腰围印度部落是北卡罗来纳州最大的美国土着部落,大约有55,000名大多居住在东南县的成员。我们评估腰遗传是否与子宫内膜癌的高风险组织学亚型相关。方法我们回顾性地分析了IRB批准的子宫内膜癌数据库的可用记录,在腰部下降的两种院制(诊断范围1980-2014)。每个腰壳均符合年龄,诊断年份和BMI到两个非腰巴控制。 Chi-Square测试用于比较分类关联。 Kaplan-Meier方法和对数秩检验用于显示和比较无病的存活(DFS)和总体存活(OS)。多变量Cox比例危害回归用于调整年龄和BMI,同时测试群组作为DFS和OS的预测。结果108个受试者,10/35(29%)腰腰和19/72(26%)非腰科受试者具有高风险(浆液/透明细胞/癌)组织学类型(P = 0.8)。 12/35(34%)腰部和24/72(33%)非腰部受试者的3级肿瘤(p = 0.9)。 5/33(15%)腰部和13/72(18%)非腰椎治疗阶段的阶段内膜癌(P = 0.7)。腰部血统与更严重的生存结果无关。与腰椎和白色受试者相比,OS(P = 0.054)和DFS(P = 0.01)均差不多。结论在这种回顾性队列队列分析中,腰母本土美国祖先并不是子宫内膜癌的高风险组织学亚型的显着独立预测因素或存活率差的结果。强调 ?在一个回顾性的队列研究中,腰腰母内膜癌症的女性与非原生的美国对照组相匹配。 ?与对照组相比,美国本土祖先的妇女没有明显更高的高风险组织学类型的发病率。 ?与白人和美洲原住民受试者相比,黑色受试者的无病生存和整体存活率降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号