首页> 外文期刊>Global spine journal. >Perioperative Anticoagulation Management in Spine Surgery: Initial Findings From the AO Spine Anticoagulation Global Survey
【24h】

Perioperative Anticoagulation Management in Spine Surgery: Initial Findings From the AO Spine Anticoagulation Global Survey

机译:脊柱外科围手术期抗凝管理:AO脊柱抗凝全球调查的初始发现

获取原文
           

摘要

Study Design: Cross-sectional, international survey. Objectives: This study addressed the global perspectives concerning perioperative use of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis during spine surgery along with its risks and benefits. Methods: A questionnaire was designed and implemented by expert members in the AO Spine community. The survey was distributed to AO Spine’s spine surgeon members (N = 3805). Data included surgeon demographic information, type and region of practice, anticoagulation principles, different patient scenarios, and comorbidities. Results: A total of 316 (8.3% response rate) spine surgeons completed the survey, representing 64 different countries. Completed surveys were primarily from Europe (31.7%), South/Latin America (19.9%), and Asia (18.4%). Surgeons tended to be 35 to 44 years old (42.1%), fellowship-trained (74.7%), and orthopedic surgeons (65.5%) from academic institutions (39.6%). Most surgeons (70.3%) used routine anticoagulation risk stratification, irrespective of geographic location. However, significant differences were seen between continents with anticoagulation initiation and cessation methodology. Specifically, the length of a procedure ( P = .036) and patient body mass index ( P = .008) were perceived differently when deciding to begin anticoagulation, while the importance of medical clearance ( P .001) and reference to literature ( P = .035) differed during cessation. For specific techniques, most providers noted use of mobilization, low-molecular-weight heparin, and mechanical prophylaxis beginning on postoperative 0 to 1 days. Conversely, bridging regimens were bimodal in distribution, with providers electing anticoagulant initiation on postoperative 0 to 1 days or days 5-6. Conclusion: This survey highlights the heterogeneity of spine care and accentuates geographical variations. Furthermore, it identifies the difficulty in providing consistent perioperative anticoagulation recommendations to patients, as there remains no widely accepted, definitive literature of evidence or guidelines.
机译:研究设计:横断面,国际调查。目的:本研究涉及在脊柱手术期间围手术期使用药理血栓血管缺陷的全球视角以及其风险和益处。方法:由AO脊椎社区的专家成员设计和实施问卷。该调查分发给AO脊柱的脊柱外科医生成员(n = 3805)。数据包括外科医生人口统计信息,效果类型和地区,抗凝原则,不同的患者情景和合并症。结果:总共316名(8.3%的回复率)脊柱外科医生完成了调查,代表64个不同的国家。完成的调查主要来自欧洲(31.7%),南/拉丁美洲(19.9%)和亚洲(18.4%)。外科医生往往35至44岁(42.1%),培训(74.7%),矫形外科医生(65.5%)来自学术机构(39.6%)。大多数外科医生(70.3%)使用常规抗凝风险分层,无论地理位置如何。然而,抗凝凝血发生和停止方法之间的大陆之间看到了显着的差异。具体地,在决定开始抗凝血时,程序(p = .036)和患者体重指数(p = .008)的长度不同,而医学间隙的重要性(p <.001)并参考文献( p = .035)在停止期间不同。对于特定技术,大多数提供者注意到从术后0至1天开始使用动员,低分子量肝素和机械预防。相反,桥接方案在分布中是双峰,供应商在术后0至1天或5-6天内选择抗凝血剂启动。结论:该调查突出了脊柱护理的异质性,并突出了地理变异。此外,它确定难以向患者提供一致的围手术期抗凝建议,因为仍然没有广泛接受的证据或准则的文献。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号