首页> 外文期刊>Geographica helvetica >(Re)claiming territory: Colombia's “territorial-peace” approach and the city
【24h】

(Re)claiming territory: Colombia's “territorial-peace” approach and the city

机译:(重新)声称领土:哥伦比亚的“领土 - 和平”方法和城市

获取原文
           

摘要

This article observes the Latin American debate on “territory” through the lens of the “territorial-peace” approach agreed in the peace accord between the Colombian government and the FARC guerrillas in 2016. It explores the different notions of territory entailed in this concept and shows that the territorial-peace approach builds on a political-programmatic understanding of territory due to its rural focus. An ethnographic analysis of the urban renewal programme PRIMED, implemented at the disputed urban periphery of Colombia's second city, Medellín, in the 1990s, demonstrates how this programme anticipated the idea of territorial peace in a conflictive urban context. The ethnography reveals the ambiguities and inconsistencies of the production of urban territory, both as state space and as the space of subaltern social groups, through territorial peacebuilding. The discussion why PRIMED challenges the political-programmatic understanding of territory in the territorial-peace debate concludes with highlighting why it makes a difference approaching territorial peace as a “political project to be achieved” or as an unpredictable process of territorialisation and why this distinction matters if the territorial-peace approach is to be extended to urban contexts.
机译:本文通过“领土 - 和平”的镜头观察拉丁美洲关于“领土”的辩论,在哥伦比亚政府与Farc游击队之间的和平协议中同意2016年的和平协定。它探讨了这一概念所需的地区的不同概念表明,由于其农村焦点,领土和平方法对对地区的政治性编程理解构成。在20世纪90年代,哥伦比亚第二城市争议的城市争议城市周边的城市更新计划的民族纪有分析展示了该计划如何预期在互联的城市背景下的领土和平的想法。民族志通过领土建设和平建设,揭示了城市领土生产的含糊不清和不一致的城市领土和亚全球社会群体的空间。讨论为什么强烈的挑战对领土在领土和平辩论中的政治计划理解得出结论,突出了为什么它使领土和政治项目成为一个“要取得的政治项目”或作为不可预测的地球发展过程以及为什么这一区分如果领土和平方法要扩展到城市背景。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号