Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”

首页> 外文期刊>Environmental health perspectives. >Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”

【24h】

Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”

机译：错误：“评估偏见风险的仪器和动物研究的其他方法标准：遗漏既定方法”

获取原文

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Environmental health perspectives.》 |2014年第9期|共1页
作者

展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods [J] . Beck Nancy B., Becker Richard A., Boobis Alan, Environmental health perspectives. . 2014,第3期

机译：评估偏见风险和其他动物研究方法标准的工具：省略完善的方法
2. Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods (vol 122, pg A66, 2014) [J] . Beck Environmental health perspectives. . 2014,第9期

机译：评估偏见风险和其他动物研究方法标准的工具：省略完善的方法（第122卷，第A66页，2014年）
3. Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods [J] . Nancy B. Beck, Richard A. Becker, Alan Boobis, Environmental health perspectives. . 2014,第3期

机译：评估偏见风险和其他动物研究方法标准的工具：省略完善的方法
4. A Study on Quantitative Methodology to Assess Cyber Security Risk of SCADA Systems [C] . Pil Sung Woo, Balho H. Kim International Conference on Energy and Environmental Protection . 2014

机译：评估SCADA系统网络安全风险的定量方法研究
5. Use of social ecology and mixed methods research to develop an instrument to assess determinants of HIV/STI risk among a young adult population. [D] . Kennedy, Lasonja B. 2013

机译：利用社会生态学和混合方法研究来开发一种工具来评估年轻人群中HIV / STI风险的决定因素。
6. Erratum: Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods [O] . 2014

机译：勘误表：评估偏见风险的工具和动物研究的其他方法标准：省略完善的方法
7. Supplemental Information 3: Description of the eight criteria designed to assess risk of bias of external validity quality in the studies. This instrument is an adapted version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies. [O] . -1

机译：补充信息3：描述八个标准，旨在评估研究中外部有效性质量偏差风险的标准。该仪器是纽卡斯尔渥太华规模（NOS）的适应版，适用于队列研究。

Erratum: “Instruments for Assessing Risk of Bias and Other Methodological Criteria of Animal Studies: Omission of Well-Established Methods”

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅