首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences >MAPPING SPATIAL ACCURACY OF FOREST TYPE CLASSIFICATION IN JAXA’s HIGH-RESOLUTION LAND USE AND LAND COVER MAP
【24h】

MAPPING SPATIAL ACCURACY OF FOREST TYPE CLASSIFICATION IN JAXA’s HIGH-RESOLUTION LAND USE AND LAND COVER MAP

机译:雅纳高分辨率土地利用和陆地覆盖地图中林型分类的绘制空间精度

获取原文
           

摘要

Accuracy assessment of forest type maps is essential to evaluate the classification of forest ecosystems quantitatively. However, map users do not understand in which regions those forest types are well classified from conventional static accuracy measures. Hence, the objective of this study is to unveil spatial heterogeneities of accuracies of forest type classification in a map. Four forest types (deciduous broadleaf forest (DBF), deciduous needleleaf forest (DNF), evergreen broadleaf forest (EBF), and evergreen needleleaf forest (ENF)) found in the JAXA’s land use / cover map of Japan were assessed by a volunteered Site-based dataset for Assessment of Changing LAnd cover by JAXA (SACLAJ). A geographically weighted (GW) correspondence matrix was applied to them to calculate the degree of overall agreements of forest type classes (forest overall accuracy), and the degree of accuracy for each forest class (forest user’s and producer’s accuracies) in a spatially varying way. This study compared spatial surfaces of these measures with static ones of them. The results show that the forest overall accuracy of the forest map tends to be relatively more accurate in the central Japan, while less in the Kansai and Chubu regions and the northern edge of Hokkaido. Static forest user’s accuracy measures for DBF, DNF, and ENF are better than forest producer’s accuracy ones, while the GW approach tells us such characteristics vary spatially and some areas have opposite trends. This kind of spatial accuracy assessment provides a more informative description of the accuracy than the simple use of conventional accuracy measures.
机译:森林类型地图的准确性评估对于定量评估森林生态系统的分类至关重要。然而,地图用户不明白,这些地区这些森林类型从传统的静态精度措施均有很好的分类。因此,本研究的目的是在地图中揭示森林类型分类精度的空间异质性。在Jaxa的土地使用/覆盖地图中发现了四种森林类型(落叶阔叶林(DBF),落叶针林林(DNF),Evergreen Broadleaf Forest(EBF)和常绿的针心林(ENF))被志愿网站评估了日本的土地使用/覆盖地图基于JAXA(SACLAJ)的改变陆地封面的基于数据集。将地理加权(GW)对应矩阵应用于它们以计算森林类型类别(森林整体准确性)的总协议程度,以及以空间不同的方式为每个森林类(森林用户和生产者的准确性)的准确度。这项研究将这些措施的空间表面与其中的静态相比。结果表明,日本中部森林地图的森林整体准确性往往更加准确,而在关西和楚鲁地区和北海道北部边缘较少。静态森林用户的DBF,DNF和ENF的准确度措施优于森林生产者的准确性,而GW方法则告诉我们这些特性在空间上变化,部分地区具有相反的趋势。这种空间精度评估提供了比较简单使用传统精度措施的准确性更具信息性的描述。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号