首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Decision-Tree Rule-Based and Random Forest Classification of High-Resolution Multispectral Imagery for Wetland Mapping and Inventory
【2h】

Decision-Tree Rule-Based and Random Forest Classification of High-Resolution Multispectral Imagery for Wetland Mapping and Inventory

机译:高分辨率多光谱图像的决策树基于规则和随机森林分类的​​湿地制图和清单

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Efforts are increasingly being made to classify the world’s wetland resources, an important ecosystem and habitat that is diminishing in abundance. There are multiple remote sensing classification methods, including a suite of nonparametric classifiers such as decision-tree (DT), rule-based (RB), and random forest (RF). High-resolution satellite imagery can provide more specificity to the classified end product, and ancillary data layers such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, and hydrogeomorphic layers such as distance-to-a-stream can be coupled to improve overall accuracy (OA) in wetland studies. In this paper, we contrast three nonparametric machine-learning algorithms (DT, RB, and RF) using a large field-based dataset (n = 228) from the Selenga River Delta of Lake Baikal, Russia. We also explore the use of ancillary data layers selected to improve OA, with a goal of providing end users with a recommended classifier to use and the most parsimonious suite of input parameters for classifying wetland-dominated landscapes. Though all classifiers appeared suitable, the RF classification outperformed both the DT and RB methods, achieving OA >81%. Including a texture metric (homogeneity) substantially improved the classification OA. However, including vegetation/soil/water metrics (based on WorldView-2 band combinations), hydrogeomorphic data layers, and elevation data layers to increase the descriptive content of the input parameters surprisingly did not markedly improve the OA. We conclude that, in most cases, RF should be the classifier of choice. The potential exception to this recommendation is under the circumstance where the end user requires narrative rules to best manage his or her resource. Though not useful in this study, continuously increasing satellite imagery resolution and band availability suggests the inclusion of ancillary contextual data layers such as soil metrics or elevation data, the granularity of which may define its utility in subsequent wetland classifications.
机译:越来越多地努力对世界湿地资源进行分类,湿地资源是一种重要的生态系统和栖息地,其数量正逐渐减少。有多种遥感分类方法,包括一套非参数分类器,例如决策树(DT),基于规则的(RB)和随机森林(RF)。高分辨率卫星图像可以为分类的最终产品提供更多的特异性,并且可以将辅助数据层(如归一化植被指数)和水文地貌层(如流向距离)耦合在一起,以提高整体精度(OA)。湿地研究。在本文中,我们使用来自俄罗斯贝加尔湖的塞伦加河三角洲的大型基于字段的数据集(n = 228)对比了三种非参数机器学习算法(DT,RB和RF)。我们还探索了选择用于改善OA的辅助数据层的用途,目的是为最终用户提供推荐的分类器以供使用,以及最简化的输入参数套件,以对湿地为主的景观进行分类。尽管所有分类器均适用,但RF分类优于DT和RB方法,OA> 81%。包括纹理度量(同质性)可显着改善分类OA。但是,令人惊讶的是,包括植被/土壤/水量度(基于WorldView-2波段组合),水文地貌数据层和高程数据层以增加输入参数的描述性内容并不能显着改善OA。我们得出结论,在大多数情况下,RF应该是选择的分类器。在最终用户需要叙述规则以最好地管理他或她的资源的情况下,此建议的潜在例外。尽管在这项研究中没有用,但不断提高的卫星图像分辨率和波段可用性表明包括了辅助的背景数据层,例如土壤度量或海拔数据,其粒度可能会定义其在随后的湿地分类中的效用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号