...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Dentistry >Two Years after Loading Performance of Implant-Supported Overdenture with Metal Bar and Low-Profile Attachments: A Prospective Case Series Multicenter Clinical Study
【24h】

Two Years after Loading Performance of Implant-Supported Overdenture with Metal Bar and Low-Profile Attachments: A Prospective Case Series Multicenter Clinical Study

机译:用金属杆和低调附件加载植入式过度植入过度的两年后:潜在案例系列多中心临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background. Prosthetic rehabilitation of patients with atrophic arches can be very challenging. Purpose. The aim of the present prospective multicenter study was to report the two-year preliminary data on clinical and radiographic performance of implant-supported overdentures with a metal bar and low-profile attachments. Material and Methods. A computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) titanium bar or a conventional cast metal bar was fabricated according to the anatomy of the ridge, prosthetic contours (teeth setup), and implant position. Three to six threadable OT Equator attachments (Rhein 83, Bologna, Italy) were placed along the implant bar. A cobalt-chromium alloy metal framework was fabricated and fitted onto the metal bar as a counterpart. Prosthetic survival rate, biologic and technical complications, peri-implant bone loss, changes in oral health impact profile index, bleeding on probing, and plaque index were reported. Results. Overall, 177 implants were placed (range three to six) to support 43 metal bars with 170 OT Equators (Rhein 83, range three to six). Eleven metal bars were fabricated using CAD/CAM technology, while the other 32 were conventionally produced using cast technique. All the participants were followed up for at least two years (mean 42.2 months, range 24–88 months) after prosthesis delivery. Two maxillary implants failed in one nonsmoking patient (1.1%). The 2-year prosthesis survival rate was 97.7%. Only three minor technical complications were reported. Two years after loading, the mean marginal bone loss was 0.22?±?0.09?mm (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.26). Two years after loading, OHIP was 22.3?±?7.1 (95% CI from 17.4 to 24.6). Compared to the baseline, the difference was statistically significant (P≤0.001). At the two-year follow-up session, successful periodontal parameters were experienced. Conclusions. Implant overdenture supported by a CAD/CAM titanium bar may be a reliable option for the treatment of the edentulous arch over a 2-year period. Oral health-related quality of life significantly improved in all treated participants.
机译:背景。萎缩拱的患者的假体康复可能非常具有挑战性。目的。目前预期多中心研究的目的是报告两年的临床和放射线表现的临床和放射线性能,用金属杆和低透气附件报告植入物支撑的过度的临床和放射线表现。材料与方法。根据脊的解剖结构,采用假肢轮廓(齿设置)和植入位置,制造了一种计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD / CAM)钛棒或传统的铸造金属棒。沿植入杆置于植入棒中的三到六个可直液式赤道附件(Rhein 83,博洛尼亚,意大利)。制造钴铬合金金属框架并装配到金属棒上作为对应物。报道了假期存活率,生物学和技术并发症,围植入骨质损失,口腔健康影响曲线指数,探测中出血和斑块指数的变化。结果。总体而言,将177种植入物放置(范围三到六个),以支持43个金属条,其中170个赤型(Rhein 83,范围三到六)。使用CAD / CAM技术制造了11个金属条,而另一个32通常使用铸造技术生产。假肢交付后,所有参与者都随访至少两年(平均42.2个月,24-88个月的范围)。两个上颌植入物在一个非墨患者中失效(1.1%)。 2年的假体存活率为97.7%。报告了三种次要的次要技术并发症。加载两年后,平均边际骨损失为0.22?±0.09?mm(95%CI:0.16至0.26)。装载两年后,OHIP是22.3?±7.1(从17.4到24.6的95%CI)。与基线相比,差异有统计学意义(P≤0.001)。在两年的后续会议上,体验成功的牙周参数。结论。由CAD / CAM钛栏支撑的植入物过度尺寸可能是在2年期间治疗透明拱的可靠选择。所有治疗的参与者在所有治疗的参与者中有关的口腔健康相关生活质量显着改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号