首页> 外文期刊>Ecology and Evolution >Calculation of narrower confidence intervals for tree mortality rates when we know nothing but the location of the death/survival events
【24h】

Calculation of narrower confidence intervals for tree mortality rates when we know nothing but the location of the death/survival events

机译:当我们只知道死亡/生存事件的位置时,计算树死亡率较窄的置信区间

获取原文
           

摘要

Many ecological applications, like the study of mortality rates, require the estimation of proportions and confidence intervals for them. The traditional way of doing this applies the binomial distribution, which describes the outcome of a series of Bernoulli trials. This distribution assumes that observations are independent and the probability of success is the same for all the individual observations. Both assumptions are obviously false in many cases. I show how to apply bootstrap and?the Poisson binomial distribution (a generalization of the binomial distribution) to the estimation of proportions. Any information at the individual level would result in better (narrower) confidence intervals around the estimation of proportions. As a case study, I applied this method to the calculation of mortality rates in a forest plot of tropical trees in Lambir Hills National Park, Malaysia. I calculated central estimates and 95% confidence intervals for species‐level mortality rates for 1,007 tree species. I used a very simple model of spatial dependence in survival to estimate individual‐level risk of mortality. The results obtained by accounting for heterogeneity in individual‐level risk of mortality were comparable to those obtained with the binomial distribution in terms of central estimates, but the precision increased in virtually all cases, with an average reduction in the width of the confidence interval of ~20%. Spatial information allows the estimation of individual‐level probabilities of survival, and this increases the precision in the estimates of mortality rates. The general method described here, with modifications, could be applied to reduce uncertainty in the estimation of proportions related to any spatially structured phenomenon with two possible outcomes. More sophisticated approaches can yield better estimates of individual‐level mortality and thus narrower confidence intervals.
机译:许多生态应用程序,如死亡率的研究,要求估计比例和对比的置信区间。这种方式的方式适用于二项式分布,描述了一系列伯努利试验的结果。该分布假设观察是独立的,并且所有个人观察的成功概率都是相同的。在许多情况下,这两个假设都显而易见。我展示了如何申请自举和?泊松二项式分布(二项份分布的泛化)到比例的估计。各个层面的任何信息都会导致更好的(较窄)围绕比例估算的置信区间。作为一个案例研究,我将这种方法应用于马来西亚兰湖山国家公园的热带树森林情节中的死亡率计算。我计算了1,007种树种的物种级死亡率95%的95%置信区间。我使用了一个非常简单的空间依赖模型,以估计死亡率的个性级别风险。通过在中央估计方面核算单个死亡率的异质性获得的结果与在中央估计方面获得的那些,但在几乎所有情况下,精度都在增加,平均减少了置信区间的宽度〜20%。空间信息允许估计存活的个体级别概率,这增加了死亡率估计的精度。这里描述的一般方法可以应用于修改以减少与具有两种可能结果的任何空间结构现象有关的比例的不确定性。更复杂的方法可以产生更好的个体级别死亡率的估计,从而越来越窄于置信区间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号