首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being >Some thoughts about the literature review in grounded theory studies
【24h】

Some thoughts about the literature review in grounded theory studies

机译:关于地面理论研究中文文学综述的几点思考

获取原文
       

摘要

Barney Glaser, the originator of the classical GT methodology, has stressed the importance of that a GT-researcher avoids preconceptions and remains open-minded to what actually appears in the re- search field. He encourages GT-researchers to “just get on and do it.” However, when a hypothesis, model or theory can be discerned in the data, a relevant literature search should be conducted and interwoven into the emerging theory. Glaser argues that an early reading of the literature (i.e., before conducting the study) is problematic. This includes that the researcher is encouraged to ignore the existing literature before entering the research field. This approach rests on the opinion that what is important in the research area will show itself repeatedly, or in other words, what is important will emerge without the “neutral” researcher is doing nothing but listen and look with an open mind. In order to understand the participants’ viewpoint, the.
机译:Barney Glaser是古典GT方法的发起者,强调了GT-研究员避免了先入为主的重要性,并且仍然对实际出现在重新搜索领域的开放性。他鼓励GT-研究人员“刚刚开始并这样做​​”。然而,当数据中可以辨别假设,模型或理论时,应进行相关的文献搜索并交织在新兴理论中。 Glaser辩称,文献早期阅读(即,在进行研究之前)是有问题的。这包括在进入研究领域之前鼓励研究人员忽视现有文献。这种方法依赖于研究领域重要的意见将反复表现出来,或者换句话说,没有“中立”的研究人员就会出现什么是重要的,只能倾听并以开放的思想看。为了了解参与者的观点,。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号