...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences >Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forceps versus conventional forceps in therapeutic extractions of premolars: a prospective clinical study
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forceps versus conventional forceps in therapeutic extractions of premolars: a prospective clinical study

机译:物理钳效果对常规镊子治疗促进的比较评价:预期临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Dental extraction is the removal of a tooth from the oral cavity and is the most common procedure performed in oral surgery. Conventional exodontia tends to cause unnecessary trauma leading to postoperative pain, loss of tissue and stress for the patient. ‘Atraumatic’ dental extraction techniques have nowadays gained popularity and in such case, physics forceps can be helpful in achieving such results. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare efficacy of physics forceps versus conventional forceps in therapeutic extraction of premolars. Methods: A total of 35 patients requiring extraction of premolars in maxillary or mandibular arch or both arches for orthodontic treatment purpose were included and divided into groups A and B wherein right sided extractions performed with physics forceps were compared with left sided extractions carried out using conventional forceps in terms of time taken for extraction, bone and soft tissue injury, success score and pain assessment. Results: The present study suggested statistically significant difference between both the groups. Time taken for extraction, trauma to gingival tissue, bone loss, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly lesser with physics forceps group, when compared to conventional forceps group. Moreover no significant difference in success score was noted between both the groups. Conclusions: Physics forceps are comparatively superior to conventional extraction forceps in terms of lesser time taken for the procedure, lesser tendency to induce trauma to both hard and soft tissue and have been found to induce comparatively lesser pain post extraction.
机译:背景:牙科提取是从口腔中移除牙齿,是口腔手术中最常见的过程。常规Exodontia往往会导致不必要的创伤导致术后疼痛,患者的组织丧失和压力。 'ATRAUMATIC'牙科提取技术现在已经受到普及,在这种情况下,物理钳可以有助于实现这些结果。该研究的目的是评估和比较物理肌肉与常规镊子在治疗中的疗程中的疗效。方法:将35例需要在上颌或下颌弓中提取前毛衣或两拱形术进行正畸治疗目的,并分为A和B组,其中使用常规进行的左侧萃取进行了用物理镊子进行的右侧萃取。镊子在提取,骨骼和软组织损伤,成功得分和疼痛评估所需的时间方面。结果:本研究表明,两组之间的统计学意义差异。与常规镊子组相比,萃取到牙龈组织,骨质损失和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分的时间明显小于物理钳组。此外,两组之间没有出现成功分数的显着差异。结论:物理镊子在较小的过程中对常规提取钳相对优于常规提取钳,诱导诱导创伤和软组织的倾向,并且已被发现诱导诱导后诱导疼痛相对较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号