首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Getting at Equality: Research Methods Informed by the Lessons of Intersectionality
【24h】

Getting at Equality: Research Methods Informed by the Lessons of Intersectionality

机译:获得平等:关于交叉课程的研究方法

获取原文
           

摘要

This article evaluates a Participatory Action Research (PAR) approach with mixed methods including concept mapping, q-sorting and deliberative dialogue in the context of a research project on young people’s experiences with digital communications technologies, and addresses some of the central insights of intersectionality theory and praxis. Our approach seeks to ensure that, insofar as possible, the gathered data provide a rich and layered window into the experiences of young people from a range of marginalized communities served by our project partners. The article revisits some key insights and contestations relating to intersectionality and addresses their relationship to our approach. We evaluate whether these methods enhance understandings of the interactions of structures of subordination with other factors identified in intersectionality scholarship, as well as the extent to which they centre the knowledge and expertise of those subordinated by matrices of domination as discussed by authors such as Crenshaw and Hill Collins. Our approach is just one of many that social science researchers interested in advancing intersectionality’s key insights could deploy. While it falls short of full consistency with these insights, its mixed methods work toward our partners’ social justice objectives while facilitating exploration of intersecting axes of subordination. Our approach can also help our project recapture the politic at the heart of many intersectional feminist critiques, such as those of Crenshaw and Hill Collins - that reconceptualizing knowledge requires centring the knowledge and expertise of those traditionally excluded due to interlocking systems of subordination.
机译:本文评估了一个参与式行动研究(PAR)方法,包括混合方法,包括在人们对数字通信技术的年轻人经验的研究项目的背景下的概念映射,Q排序和审议对话,并解决了交叉口理论的一些中央见解和praxis。我们的方法旨在确保尽可能突出,所聚集的数据为年轻人提供了丰富和分层的窗口,从我们项目合作伙伴服务的一系列边缘化社区提供了年轻人的经验。文章重新审视了与交叉关系有关的一些关键见解和争论,并解决了与我们的方法的关系。我们评估这些方法是否增强了与交叉奖学金中确定的其他因素的从属结构的互动的谅解,以及他们将这些归属于统治的知识和专业知识的统治程度,如Crenshaw等作者所讨论的山柯林斯。我们的方法只是许多人中有兴趣推进交叉口的主要见解的社会科学研究人员之一。虽然它与这些洞察力完全一致,但其混合方法朝着我们的合作伙伴的社会正义目标努力,同时促进了探索从属的交叉轴。我们的方法还可以帮助我们的项目在许多交叉女性主义批评的核心中重新夺回政治,例如Crenshaw和Hill Collins的核心,即重型知识要求将传统被排除的人的知识和专业知识居中,因其互锁的互锁系统而被排除在外。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号