首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism
【24h】

Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

机译:心理学交叉关系研究的研究方法:与多数世界妇女基层激活主义有十年的协同工作通报的例子

获取原文
           

摘要

Very few theories have generated the kind of interdisciplinary and international engagement that marks the intellectual history of intersectionality, leaving some authors to suggest that intersectionality is the most important theoretical contribution that the field of women’s studies has made thus far. Yet, consideration of intersectionality as a research paradigm has yet to gain a wide foothold in mainstream psychology. The current article uses a program of multimethod research designed in partnership with, and intending to center the intersectional experiences of, majority world women to propose a research agenda for the empirical study of intersectionality. Specifically, it is suggested that a research agenda rooted in intersectional understandings requires that: (1) researchers think carefully about social categories of analysis and how their methodological choices can best answer those questions, (2) psychologists reposition their research questions to examine processes by which structural inequities lead to power imbalances and gender-based norms that sustain women’s experience of marginalization and oppression, and (3) we understand how intersectional experiences can be applied toward change. Intersectional investigations hold a key to interrupting the structural dimensions of power that result in egregious consequences to peoples’ social, economic, and political lives, but only if we radically restructure what we think about knowledge, our roles, and the products of our research.
机译:很少有理论产生了跨学科和国际参与的那种标志着智力历史的交叉点,留下一些作者表示,交叉表现是妇女研究领域迄今为止的最重要的理论贡献。然而,作为研究范式的交叉点的考虑尚未在主流心理学中获得很大立足点。目前的文章采用了与伙伴关系的多国内学研究,并打算将大多数世界妇女的交叉体验中心居中,提出了一项研究议程,以提出互补性的实证研究。具体来说,有人建议植根于交叉谅解的研究要求:(1)研究人员仔细思考社会分析以及他们的方法选择如何最好地回答这些问题,(2)心理学家重新定位他们的研究问题来检查流程哪些结构性不公平能力导致权力不平衡和基于性别的规范,维持妇女的边缘化和压迫的经验,以及(3)我们了解交叉体验如何适应变革。交叉调查持有一个关键来中断力量的结构维度,这导致人民社会,经济和政治生活的令人震惊的后果,但只有我们从根本上重组我们对知识,角色和我们研究的产品的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号