首页> 外文会议>14th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering 2006(ICONE14) vol.1 >LESSONS LEARNED FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF WESTINGHOUSE OWNERS GROUP RISK-INFORMED INSERVICE INSPECTION METHODOLOGY FOR PIPING
【24h】

LESSONS LEARNED FROM IMPLEMENTATION OF WESTINGHOUSE OWNERS GROUP RISK-INFORMED INSERVICE INSPECTION METHODOLOGY FOR PIPING

机译:实施西屋所有者集团风险信息型管道检查方法的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Risk-informed inservice inspection (ISI) programs have been in use for over seven years as an alternative to current regulatory requirements in the development and implementation of ISI programs for nuclear plant piping systems. Programs using the Westinghouse Owners Group (WOG) (now known as the Pressurized Water Reactor Owners Group - PWROG) risk-informed ISI methodology have been developed and implemented within the U.S. and several other countries. Additionally, many plants have conducted or are in the process of conducting updates to their risk-informed ISI programs. In the development and implementation of these risk-informed ISI programs and the associated updates to those programs, the following important lessons learned have been identified and are addressed. 1. Concepts such as "loss of inventory," which are typicallyrnnot modeled in a plant's probabilistic risk assessmentrn(PRA) model for all systems.rn2. The importance of considering operator actions in the identification of consequences associated with a piping failure and the categorization of segments as high safety significant (HSS) or low safety significant (LSS).rn3. The impact that the above considerations have had on the large early release frequency (LERF) and categorization of segments as HSS or LSS.rn4. The importance of automation.rn5. Making the update process more efficient to reduce costs associated with maintaining the risk-informed ISI program. The insights gained are associated with many of the stepsrnin the risk-informed ISI process including: development of the consequences associated with piping failures, categorization of segments, structural element selection and program updates. Many of these lessons learned have impacted the results of the risk-informed ISI programs and have impacted the updates to those programs. This paper summarizes the lessons learned and insights gained from the application of the WOG risk-informed ISI methodology in the U.S., Europe and Asia.
机译:在开发和实施用于核电站管道系统的ISI计划时,以风险为依据的在役检查(ISI)计划已使用超过七年,以替代当前的法规要求。在美国和其他几个国家/地区,已经开发并实施了使用西屋所有者小组(WOG)(现称为压水堆所有者小组-PWROG)风险相关的ISI方法的计划。此外,许多工厂已经或正在对其风险知情的ISI计划进行更新。在开发和实施这些告知风险的ISI程序以及对这些程序的相关更新时,已经确定并解决了以下重要经验教训。 1.诸如“库存损失”之类的概念通常在所有系统的工厂概率风险评估模型(PRA)中均未建模。在识别与管道故障相关的后果以及将段分类为高安全重要度(HSS)或低安全重要度(LSS)时考虑操作员行动的重要性。以上考虑因素对较大的早期发布频率(LERF)以及将段分类为HSS或LSS.rn4的影响。自动化的重要性。使更新过程更有效,以减少与维护风险相关的ISI程序相关的成本。所获得的见解与风险知情的ISI流程中的许多步骤相关,包括:与管道故障,段的分类,结构元件选择和程序更新相关的后果的开发。这些经验教训中的许多都影响了对风险了解的ISI计划的结果,并影响了这些计划的更新。本文总结了在美国,欧洲和亚洲应用WOG风险信息化ISI方法学所获得的经验教训和见解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号