...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease >Optimization of Nebulized Budesonide in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
【24h】

Optimization of Nebulized Budesonide in the Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

机译:雾化预皂化剂优化治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加剧的治疗方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Clinical studies have suggested nebulized budesonide (NB) as an alternative to systemic corticosteroids for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). However, the optimal budesonide dose for AECOPD remains unclear. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of different doses of NB in the management of AECOPD. Patients and Methods: A total of 321 AECOPD patients with moderate-to-severe exacerbation were randomly divided into three groups and treated with NB. The low dose group (L) was given 4 mg/day (n=95, 1 mg Q6h), while high-dose group 1 (H1, n=111, 2 mg Q6h) and high-dose group 2 (H2, n=115, 4 mg Q12h) were given 8 mg/day. Patients also received routine treatment including oxygen therapy, expectorant, nebulization bronchodilators, antibiotics, and fluid rehydration. The COPD assessment test (CAT), lung function, and artery blood gas were evaluated before and after 3 hrs and 5 days of treatment. In addition, hospital stay, frequency of acute exacerbations within 3 months of discharge, and adverse events during treatment were compared. Results: H1 and H2 showed improved spirograms and CAT score faster than L. In H2, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEVsub1/sub%) at 3 hrs and FEVsub1/sub%, forced expiratory flow after 50% of the forced vital capacity has been exhaled (FEFsub50%/sub), mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of forced vital capacity (FEFsub25– 75%/sub) and CAT score at 5 days were significantly improved compared to L. FEVsub1/sub% improved most in H2, moderately in H1, and least in L, with significant differences between groups at 5 days. No differences between groups were observed in adverse effects, hospital stay, and frequency of exacerbations within 3 months of discharge. Conclusion: Compared to the conventional dose (4 mg/day), a high dose (8 mg/day) of NB improved pulmonary function and symptoms more effectively in the early treatment of AECOPD, especially when given as 4 mg twice daily.
机译:背景:临床研究提出了雾化的预皂苷(NB)作为慢性阻塞性肺病(AECOPD)急性加剧患者的全身皮质类固醇的替代品。然而,ACOPD的最佳水果苷剂量仍然不清楚。目的:比较ECOPD管理中不同剂量NB的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:共321名患有中度至严重的加剧的患者随机分为三组,并用NB处理。低剂量组(L)给出4mg /天(n = 95,1 mg Q6H),而高剂量组1(H1,N = 111,2mg Q6H)和高剂量组2(H2,N = 115,4mg Q12h)给出8毫克/天。患者还接受了常规治疗,包括氧疗法,祛痰,雾化支气管扩张剂,抗生素和流体再水合作用。在3小时和5天的治疗之前和5天后评估COPD评估试验(CAT),肺功能和动脉血液。此外,在放电3个月内3个月内急性加剧的频率和治疗期间的不良事件。结果:H1和H2显示出改善的螺旋图和猫得分比L.在H2中,在3小时和FEV 1 1 %的1 s(fev 1 %)中的强制呼气量强制呼气能力50%后的强制呼气流动(FEF <亚> 50%),平均强制呼气流量为25%至75%的强制生命能力(FEF 25-75与L.FEV 1 %在H 2中,在H1中适度的H1,最小值中的增强,在H1中的增加,5天内,5天的%)和猫分数显着改善。天。在出院后3个月内观察到不利影响,住院住宿和加剧频率之间的差异。结论:与常规剂量(4mg /天)相比,在早期治疗EACOPD时,高剂量(8毫克/天),Nb的高剂量(8mg /天)改善肺功能和症状,特别是当每天两次给出4毫克时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号