...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Multi-Stakeholder Decision Aid for Improved Prioritization of the Public Health Impact of Climate Sensitive Infectious Diseases
【24h】

Multi-Stakeholder Decision Aid for Improved Prioritization of the Public Health Impact of Climate Sensitive Infectious Diseases

机译:多利益相关者决策援助改善气候敏感传染病公共卫生影响的优先级

获取原文
           

摘要

The effects of climate change on infectious diseases are an important global health concern and necessitate decisions for allocation of resources. Economic tools have been used previously; however, how prioritization results might differ when done using broader considerations identified by local stakeholders has yet to be assessed. A multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach was used to assess multi-stakeholder expressed concerns around disease prioritization via focus groups held in Quebec and Burkina Faso. Stakeholders weighted criteria and comparisons were made across study sites. A pilot disease prioritization was done to examine effects on disease rankings. A majority of identified criteria were common to both sites. The effect of context specific criteria and weights resulted in similar yet distinct prioritizations of diseases. The presence of consistent criteria between sites suggests that common concerns exist for prioritization; however, context-specific adjustments reveal much regarding resource availability, capacity and concerns that should be considered as this impacts disease ranking. Participatory decision aid approaches facilitate rich knowledge exchange and problem structuring. Furthermore, given multiple actors in low- and middle-income countries settings, multi-actor collaborations across non-governmental organizations, local government and community are important. Formal mechanisms such as MCDA provide means to foster consensus, shared awareness and collaboration.
机译:气候变化对传染病的影响是一个重要的全球健康问题,并需要进行资源分配的决策。以前使用过经济工具;但是,在使用由当地利益攸关方确定的更广泛的考虑完成时,优先考虑结果可能会有所不同。多铁决策分析(MCDA)方法用于评估多利益攸关方通过魁北克和布基纳法索举行的焦点小组对疾病优先级的关注。利益攸关方加权标准和比较跨学习地点进行。试验疾病优先考虑是为了检查对疾病排名的影响。两种地点都有大多数已识别的标准。背景特异性标准和重量的效果导致疾病相似但不同的优先症。站点之间一致标准的存在表明,优先顺序存在共同的问题;但是,具体背景调整揭示了应考虑的资源可用性,容量和疑虑,因为这种影响疾病排名。参与式决策援助方法有助于丰富的知识交流和问题结构。此外,在低收入和中等收入国家的情况下,在非政府组织,地方政府和社区中的多演员合作都很重要。 MCDA等正式机制提供了促进共识,共同意识和合作的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号