...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >Different 2D ultrasound calculation methods to evaluate tongue volume for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy
【24h】

Different 2D ultrasound calculation methods to evaluate tongue volume for prediction of difficult laryngoscopy

机译:不同的2D超声计算方法来评估舌卷以预测困难的喉镜检查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare three different ultrasonographic calculation methods for tongue volume in a real time 2D ultrasonography and correlate with Modified Cormack–Lehane grading observed under direct laryngoscopy. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care institute. Tongue volume was assessed ultrasonically in 50 adult patients using three techniques in all the patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia and correlated with Modified Cormack–Lehane grading. In METHOD A, the tongue volume was calculated as multiplication of mid sagittal cross-sectional area and width in transverse plane; METHOD B, Cross-sectional area obtained in vertical plane was multiplied with the maximum width of tongue in transverse plane; METHOD C. the volume was calculated by multiplying length, width, and height in vertical, transverse, and mid-sagittal/oblique plane, respectively. The analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21.0. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to find out cutoff point of different methods for predicting difficult laryngoscopy. Results: The specificity and sensitivity of three different methods were statistically compared and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for method A, B, and C was 0.562, 0.502, and 0.548, respectively. Conclusion: In our study, we found all three methods to calculate tongue volume to be equally good to assess difficult laryngoscopy.
机译:背景和宗旨:该研究的目的是在实时2D超声检查中评估和比较舌卷的三种不同的超声计算方法,并与在直接喉镜检查下观察到的改性Cormack-Lehane分级。方法:该预期观察研究是在第三级护理研究所进行的。在全身麻醉下进行手术的所有患者中使用三种成人患者进行舌卷,在50例成年患者中进行过度评估,并与改良的Cormack-Lehane分级相关。在方法A中,舌卷被计算为中矢状横截面积和横向宽度的倍增;方法B,在垂直平面中获得的横截面积乘以横向平面中的最大舌头;方法C.通过分别乘以垂直,横向和中矢状/倾斜平面中的长度,宽度和高度来计算体积。分析是使用统计包进行社会科学(SPSS)版本21.0进行的。接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线用于找出不同方法的截止点,以预测困难的喉镜检查。结果:三种不同方法的特异性和敏感性在统计上比较,并且在方法A,B和C的接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线下的面积分别为0.562,0.502和0.548。结论:在我们的研究中,我们发现所有三种方法计算舌卷同样良好,以评估困难的喉镜检查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号