...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of Anaesthesia >A randomised controlled trial to study Bispectral guided induction of general anaesthesia using propofol and etomidate infusion
【24h】

A randomised controlled trial to study Bispectral guided induction of general anaesthesia using propofol and etomidate infusion

机译:一种随机对照试验,用于研究双光谱引导诱导全身麻醉使用异烯醇和膦酸盐输注

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: The present prospective, randomised study was done to evaluate induction characteristics with bispectral (BIS) index guided infusion of propofol and etomidate. Materials and Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval, 70 patients, aged 18–60 years, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) I and II scheduled for elective surgery were included. Patients were randomly allocated into one of the two groups. In Group E, patients received etomidate infusion at a rate of 0.07 mg kg-1 min-1 and in Group P, received propofol infusion of 0.7 mg kg-1 min-1. Time from start of infusion to loss of palpebral reflex (TP), loss of verbal command (TV), BIS to reach 50 (TBIS50), mean induction dose and incremental dose of each drug required to keep BIS50., haemodynamic parameters and adverse effects like pain, myoclonus, apnoea and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were also noted. Results: TP,TV, and TBIS 50 was faster in E as compared to P group and was statistically significant for all parameters. Mean induction dose of drug required till BIS 50 was 2.68 ± 0.56 mg kg-1 and 0.242 ± 0.11 mg kg-1 in group P and E, respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups with group E requiring incremental dose in a significant proportion of patients (P = 0.004). There was a significant decrease in MAP in P group as compared to E. In group P, more number of patients experienced pain and had apnoea episode as compared to group E. (P 0.001). Myoclonus was observed in group E only (P = 0.016). Conclusion: BIS-guided titration of propofol and etomidate infusion for induction did not result in reduction of the dose, haemodynamic variations and other effects.
机译:背景和目的:目前的前瞻性,随机研究是为了评估与双光谱(BIS)指数引导异丙酚和依托酸酯的诱导特性的诱导特征。材料和方法:在制度伦理委员会批准后,70名患者,18-60岁,包括在选修外科的Asaesiesiologist(ASA)I和II的美国人学会。患者随机分配给两组中的一组。在E组中,患者以0.07mg KG-1 min-1和P组的速率接受替代输注,接受了0.7mg kg-1 min-1的异丙酚输注。从输注开始失去脑电图(TP)的时间,口头指挥(电视),BIS达到50(TBIS50),平均诱导剂量和每种药物的增量剂量,需要保持双50所需的药物,血液动力学参数和不良反应还注意到疼痛,肌阵挛,呼吸暂停和术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)。结果:与P组相比,TP,TV和TBIS 50更快,对所有参数进行统计学意义。平均诱导剂量在P〜50℃下为2.68±0.56mg KG-1和0.242±0.11mg Kg-1。 e与大量患者中患者的群体的群体之间存在显着差异(p = 0.004)。与E.在P组中,在P组中,在P组中,患者的疼痛数量较多,与E组相比,P组的显着降低,并且与E组相比具有呼吸暂停发作。(p <0.001)。在E组中观察到肌阵挛(P = 0.016)。结论:双引导滴定的异丙酚和依托咪酯输注诱导不会导致剂量,血液动力学变化和其他作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号