...
首页> 外文期刊>International heart journal >Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Dispatcher Assistance on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Adult Patients by Location of Arrest
【24h】

Impact of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Dispatcher Assistance on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Among Adult Patients by Location of Arrest

机译:旁观者心肺复苏和调度员援助对成人患者的医院内心脏骤停后存活的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

We investigated the impact of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), dispatcher assistance (DA), and location of arrest on survival and outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).From a nationwide population-based registry of OHCA patients in Japan, we enrolled adult patients with bystander-witnessed OHCA of medical origin between 2013 and 2015. The primary outcome measure was a neurologically favorable outcome, defined by cerebral performance category 1 or 2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effects of bystander CPR and DA by location of arrest. A total of 104,621 cases were included (15,984 bystander CPR without DA [15.3%], 40,087 bystander CPR with DA [38.3%], and 48,550 no bystander CPR [46.4%]). In public locations, both the bystander-CPR-with-DA group (22.9% [1,068/4,665]; adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.43-1.85) and the bystander-CPR-without-DA group (25.8% [918/3,557]; AOR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.24-1.65) had neurologically favorable outcomes compared with the no-bystander-CPR group (9.9% [610/6,133]). In residential locations, the AORs were 1.44 (95% CI, 1.22-1.70) in the bystander-CPR-without-DA group and 1.60 (95% CI, 1.45-1.77) in the bystander-CPR-with-DA group. However, in nursing homes, bystander CPR was not associated with improved outcomes of OHCA, regardless of the implementation of DA.Bystander CPR with or without DA had better outcomes after OHCA in residential and public locations but not in nursing homes.
机译:我们调查了旁观者启动的心肺复苏(CPR),调度员援助(DA)以及逮捕的位置,以及在医院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的生存和结果的位置。从全国范围的人口患者的基于人口的患者的登记处在日本,我们在2013年和2015年期间注册了成年人旁观者目睹了旁观者的医学源患者。主要结果措施是一种神经学良好的结果,由脑表现1或2.多变量逻辑回归分析用于评估效果旁观者CPR和DA通过逮捕的位置。包括总共104,621例(15,984个旁边CPR,没有DA [15.3%],40,087个旁边CPR,DA [38.3%],48,550个NO BYBER CPR [46.4%])。在公共场所,旁观者-CPR-ad-DA组(22.9%[1,068 / 4,665];调整后的赔率比(AOR),1.62; 95%置信区间(CI),1.43-1.85)和旁边的CPR-没有-DA组(25.8%[918 / 3,557]; AOR,1.43; 95%CI,1.24-1.65)与No-Bystrander-CPR组相比具有神经效益的结果(9.9%[610 / 6,133])。在住宅位置,在旁边-CPR-FAT-DA组和1.60(95%CI,1.45-1.77)中,AORs在旁边的旁边的AS-CPR-达-DA组中为1.44(95%CI,1.22-1.70)。然而,在护理家庭中,旁观者CPR与OHCA的改善结果无关,无论DA.ByStander CPR的实施如何,没有DA在住宅和公共场所的OHCA后具有更好的结果,但不在护理家庭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号