首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine >Cross-Disciplinary Appraisal of Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey
【24h】

Cross-Disciplinary Appraisal of Knowledge and Beliefs Regarding the Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorders in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey

机译:关于印度自闭症谱系疾病诊断的跨学科评价:横断面调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Many healthcare professionals, including pediatricians, psychiatrists, Clinical Psychologists (CPs), Occupational Therapists (OTs), and Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs), are involved in the identification and intervention of Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) in children. Distinctive training backgrounds and professional exposure can result in contrasting ideas regarding the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of ASD. Only a few studies have addressed the cross-disciplinary perspective of knowledge, belief, and awareness about diagnostic criteria required for diagnosing ASD. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 allied healthcare professionals (98 SLPs, 33 CPs, and 23 OTs) participated in the study. The survey tool used for this study was adapted from a previously available survey on the assessment of knowledge and belief about ASD and self-efficacy. Results: The overall knowledge and belief of allied healthcare professionals regarding ASD differed significantly across the groups. However, the knowledge of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5) diagnostic criteria for ASD did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion: Our findings have salient clinical implications and advocates for the continued education of healthcare professionals in India regarding recent diagnostic criteria for ASD.
机译:背景:许多医疗保健专业人员,包括儿科医生,精神科医生,临床心理学家(CPS),职业治疗师(OTS)和语言病理学家(SLP),参与了儿童自闭症谱系统疾病(ASD)的识别和干预。独特的培训背景和专业曝光可能导致对对亚摩达特的评估,诊断和治疗的思想形成鲜明对比。少数研究已经解决了知识,信念和意识的跨学科视野,了解诊断亚本款所需的诊断标准。材料和方法:共有154名盟军医疗保健专业人员(98个SLP,33个CP和23个OTS)参加了该研究。用于本研究的调查工具由先前可用的调查调整,评估知识和对亚本亚当和自我效能的信念。结果:对亚澳大利亚委员会的盟军医疗保健专业人员的整体知识和信仰在整个群体中有大量不同。但是,在组中的精神障碍诊断和统计手册的知识,第五版(DSM-5)ASD诊断标准在组之间没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究结果对印度的医疗保健专业人员持续教育有关近期款式的诊断标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号