首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Building capacity: a cross-sectional evaluation of the US Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health
【24h】

Building capacity: a cross-sectional evaluation of the US Training Institute for Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health

机译:建筑能力:对健康传播与实施研究所的美国培训研究所的横截面评价

获取原文
       

摘要

BACKGROUND:In 2011, the National Institute of Health (NIH) initiated the Training in Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health (TIDIRH) program. Over its first 5?years, TIDIRH provided an in-person, week-long training to 197 investigators who were new to the dissemination and implementation (D&I) field. This paper evaluates the long-term impact of TIDIRH on trainees' use of D&I methods, collaborations, and research funding.METHODS:Trainees were selected to participate through a competitive process. We compared the 197 trainees to 125 unselected applicants (UAs) whose application score was within one standard deviation of the mean for all trainees' scores for the same application year. A portfolio analysis examined electronic applications for NIH peer-reviewed funding submitted by trainees and UAs between 2011 and 2019. A survey of trainees and UAs was conducted in 2016, as was a faculty survey among the 87 individuals who served as TIDIRH instructors.RESULTS:A major goal of TIDIRH was to build the field, at least in part through networking and collaboration. Thirty-eight percent of trainees indicated they had extensive contact with faculty following the training, and an additional 38% indicated they had at least limited contact. Twenty-four percent of trainees had extensive collaboration with other fellows post-TIDIRH, and 43% had at least limited contact. Collaborative activities included the full range of academic activities, including manuscript development, grant writing, and consultation/collaboration on research studies. The portfolio analysis combining grant mechanisms showed that overall, TIDIRH trainees submitted more peer-reviewed NIH grants per person than UA and had significantly better funding outcomes (25% vs 19% funded, respectively). The greatest difference was for large research project, program/center, and cooperative agreement grants mechanisms.CONCLUSIONS:Overall, this evaluation found that TIDIRH is achieving its three primary goals: (1) building a pipeline of D&I investigators, (2) creating a network of scholars to build the field, and (3) improving funding outcomes for D&I grants.
机译:背景:2011年,国家健康研究所(NIH)启动了卫生(TIDIRH)计划的传播和实施研究培训。在其前5年?多年来,Tidirh为197个调查人员提供了一个亲自,周长培训,他们是传播和实施(D&I)领域的新手。本文评估了Tidirh对学员对D&I方法,合作和研究资助的长期影响。方法:学员被选中参加竞争过程。我们将197名学员与125名未选申请人(UAS)进行了比较,其应用得分是对同一申请年度所有受训人员分数的平均值的一个标准偏差。投资组合分析审查了2011年和2019年在2019年至2019年间由学员和UA提交的NIH同伴审查资金的电子申请。2016年对学员和UA进行了调查,这是一个担任Tidirh教练的87个人中的教师调查。结果: Tidirh的主要目标是建立该领域,至少部分通过网络和协作。 388%的学员表明他们与培训后的教师进行了广泛的接触,另外38%表示他们至少有限制接触。 24%的学员与Tidirh后的其他研究员进行了广泛的合作,43%的接触接触至少有限。协作活动包括全方位的学术活动,包括手稿开发,授予撰写和研究研究咨询/协商/合作。组合分析结合赠款机制表明,整体而言,Tidirh培训员均提交比UA的每人更多同行评审NIH补助金,并分别具有更好的资金成果(分别为19%的资助25%vs)。最大的差异是大型研究项目,计划/中心和合作协议授予机制。结论:总体而言,该评估发现Tidirh正在实现其三个主要目标:(1)建立D&I调查员的管道,(2)创建一个建立领域的学者网络,(3)改善D&I赠送的资金成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号