首页> 外文期刊>Implementation Science >Reporting quality of European and Croatian health practice guidelines according to the RIGHT reporting checklist
【24h】

Reporting quality of European and Croatian health practice guidelines according to the RIGHT reporting checklist

机译:根据正确的报告清单报告欧洲和克罗地亚健康实践指南的质量

获取原文
       

摘要

Health practice guidelines (HPGs) are important tools for the translation of evidence into practice. Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist provides guidance on reporting health practice guidelines (HPGs). We assessed the reporting completeness and quality of a set of national (Croatian) and relevant transnational (European) HPGs. The national sample included all HPGs published in the official journal of the Croatian Medical Association in 2014–2016. We searched PubMed to identify relevant European guidelines (n?=?24). Two independent reviewers assessed the adherence with the items on the RIGHT checklist. Kappa score was used to measure the level of agreement. Frequentist and Bayes statistics Bayes factor (BF10) was used to evaluate the differences between the national and transnational HPGs. Overall, Croatian and European HPGs adhered to less than 50% of RIGHT checklist items. Croatian HPGs reported a median of 14.0 (95% CI 13.0–15.0) RIGHT reporting items, and European counterparts reported a median of 16.0 (95% CI 14.0–17.2) out of the total of 35 checklist items (Mann Whitney U test, P?=?0.048; BF10?=?1.543). European HPGs were better than Croatian HPGs in reporting stakeholder involvement and values and preferences (BF10?=?80.63), as well as describing the implications of costs and resources (BF10?=?55.15). Croatian HPGs better reported HPGs specified aims (BF10?=?16.90), primary intended users (BF10?=?8.70), and sources of funding (BF10?=?122.90). Most insufficiently reported items for both HPG sets were defining the guideline questions and clear outcomes, quality assurance, management of funding and conflicts of interest, and guideline limitations. Important methodological details are missing from most published HPGs at national and transnational levels. To ensure better quality and adequate use of HPGs, reporting guidelines should be endorsed and used by developers and users alike.
机译:健康实践指南(HPGS)是将证据转换为实践的重要工具。医疗保健(右)清单中的实践指南报告项目提供了关于报告卫生实践指南(HPG)的指导。我们评估了一套国家(克罗地亚)和相关跨国(欧洲)HPG的报告完整性和质量。国家样本包括2014 - 2016年克罗地亚医学会官方刊物的所有恒生委员会。我们搜查了Pubmed以确定相关的欧洲指南(n?=?24)。两个独立审稿人评估了右键清单上的物品的依从性。 Kappa得分用于衡量协议水平。频繁的频率和贝叶斯统计贝叶斯因子(BF10)用于评估国家和跨国HPG之间的差异。总体而言,克罗地亚和欧洲恒生委员会秉承不到50%的正确清单物品。克罗地亚人民币报告称中位数为14.0(95%CI 13.0-15.0)右侧报告项目,欧洲同行报告的中位数为16.0(95%CI 14.0-17.2)中的35项,其中35个清单项目(Mann Whitney U Test,P ?=?0.048; BF10?=?1.543)。欧洲HPGS在报告利益相关者的参与和价值观和偏好方面优于克罗地亚·氟普斯(BF10?= 80.63),以及描述成本和资源的影响(BF10?=?55.15)。克罗地亚人HPGS更好地报告了HPGS指定的目标(BF10?=?16.90),主要预期用户(BF10?= 8.70),以及资金来源(BF10?= 122.90)。据报道,氟氯浦套装最不流动的物品定义了指南问题和明确的结果,质量保证,资金管理和利益冲突以及指导措施。在国家和跨国层面的大多数公布的HPG中缺少重要的方法。为确保更好的质量和充分利用HPG,应通过开发人员和用户获得报告准则和使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号