...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Dental Research >In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha
【24h】

In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha

机译:在体外比较闭合系统的微生物渗漏:epiphany用Resilon,Guttaflow和Gutta Percha

获取原文

摘要

Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.
机译:目的:比较三根管道填充材料的微生物泄漏:αhlul与Gutta-percha,epiphany用Resilon,以及使用肠球菌粪便作为细菌标记的Guttaflow。材料和方法:总共30次龋齿,使用具有直根的人的上颌切牙。用金刚石圆盘去加冕牙齿,并且对于所有标本标准化长度。通过冠状部分完成接入开口,并确定工作长度。所有牙齿都准备到顶部和冠状标准尺寸。然后将牙齿随机分为三个实验组。在根系中闭合后,除顶端2mm外,牙齿的外表面涂覆有两层钉珐琅。然后使用E.粪便进行细菌泄漏试验,作为双腔细菌泄漏模型中的细菌标记为30天。使用统计分析:Chi-Square测试。结果结果:结果表明,Resilon / Epiphany(Group-2)呈现少量泄漏,Gutta-percha / ah Plus(组-1)显示出最大泄漏,两者之间的统计学显着差异(P <0.05)。 Guttaflow(Group-3)还表现出少于Gutta-percha / ah加(组-1)的泄漏,两者之间的统计学显着差异(p <0.05)。 Reselon / Epiphany(2族)和Guttaflow(组-3)之间没有统计学上没有统计学差异。结论:Resilon / Epiphany和Guttaflow组比Gutta-Percha / Ah Plus组逐渐显示出较少的微生物泄漏。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号