首页> 外文会议>International Seminar on Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine >Comparative Study Regarding Two Obturation Methods With Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha For The Root Canals
【24h】

Comparative Study Regarding Two Obturation Methods With Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha For The Root Canals

机译:对根系热塑性塑化的牙齿塑性致塑性致塑性的比较研究

获取原文

摘要

AIM: This study draws a comparison, through the transparentization method, focusing on the quality of the canal obturation made with thermoplasticized gutta-percha, between two different systems: GuttaMaster VDW (Miinchen, Germany), based on obturators made of a plastic core, covered in alpha gutta-percha, and a system of vertical warm condensation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study focused on twenty teeth extracted for various reasons which underwent the endodontic treatment realized through a hybrid technique, using the rotary files system of NiTi MTWO (VDW, Miinchen, Germany), and the manual files k-file type (Kendo, VDW, Miinchen, Germany). The teeth were distributed into two groups often. The teeth in the first group underwent obturation using the CWC technique of vertical warm obturation, and the teeth in the second group underwent root obturation using the GuttaMaster system (VDW, Miinchen, Germany). The teeth were decalcified in nitric acid. Using the method of transparentization with methyl salicylate, there were emphasized aspects regarding the abilities of each method to seal three-dimensionally the endodontic space.RESULTS: The teeth which underwent vertical obturation presented many more holes in the obturation material, holes situated mainly in the medial and coronary third. However, these teeth presented the highest degree of insertion in the lateral canals, as compared to the other obturation technique employed. The homogeneity of the root obturation had not had any statistical significant differences between the two techniques. However, the technique of injecting thermoplasticized gutta-percha was superior to the other one regarding the tightness on the edge and the degree of penetration in the lateral canals.CONCLUSIONS: The knowledge of both the qualities and the limits of the obturation material chosen, as well as the correctness of performing the two techniques, determines a definite improvement of the quality of the canal treatment, which ends with a three-dimensional canal obturation.
机译:目的:本研究得出的比较,通过透明化方法,着眼于与热塑牙胶制成的管充填的质量,两个不同的系统之间:GuttaMaster VDW(Miinchen,德国),基于由塑料芯的阻塞器,涵盖的α-牙胶,和垂直温暖condensation.MATERIALS和方法的系统:该研究集中于针对经历通过混合技术来实现的牙髓治疗,使用镍钛MTWO的旋转文件系统中的各种原因中提取20个齿(VDW ,Miinchen,德国),和手动文件的k文件类型(剑道,VDW,Miinchen,德国)。牙齿被分配到两组频繁。在使用垂直温暖密闭的CWC技术所述第一组行充填齿,以及使用该系统GuttaMaster(VDW,Miinchen,德国)在所述第二组行根充填牙齿。齿在硝酸脱钙。使用透明化的方法用水杨酸甲酯,没有关于每种方法的能力密封三维牙髓space.RESULTS强调方面:其经受垂直充填在密闭材料提出了许多多个孔上的齿,孔主要位于内侧和冠状动脉第三。然而,这些齿插入呈现的最高程度在横向管相比,所采用的其它技术密闭。根密闭的同质性尚未有两种技术之间的任何统计显著差异。然而,该技术热塑体内注射杜仲胶优于关于边缘上的密封性和渗透的横向canals.CONCLUSIONS程度的另一个:品质和充填材料的选择的范围两者的知识,如以及执行两种技术的正确性,确定管治疗,其与三维管充填结束的质量的一个明确的改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号