首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Saudi medicine. >Comparison of the Baska and I-gel supraglottic airway devices: a randomized controlled study
【24h】

Comparison of the Baska and I-gel supraglottic airway devices: a randomized controlled study

机译:Baska和I-Gel Suprottic气道装置的比较:随机对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Laryngeal masks are increasingly used in place of endotracheal intubation or face masks for maintaining the airway during surgery. Compare the insertion time and other features of the Baska and I-gel masks in patients undergoing general anesthesia for urological surgery. Randomized-controlled, single-blind study. Urology surgical operating rooms of a tertiary care hospital. We enrolled concomitant patients whose surgery was expected to last less than two hours. Following premedication and adequate relaxation, subjects were randomly allocated to the I-gel mask or the Baska mask. Computer-generated random numbers were used for randomization with sealed opaque envelopes for allocation concealment. The primary outcome measure of the study was the time required for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Also, the number of device placement attempts, the number of postoperative signs and symptoms (cough, breath holding, laryngeal spasm, lip trauma, blood on the mask), and laryngopharyngeal morbidity scores at 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. 211 met inclusion criteria, 200 participants completed the study. Compared to I-gel, the Baska mask required a longer time for insertion, and its airway pressure was higher. The median (minimum-maximum) duration of LMA insertion in the Baska and I-gel groups was 14 (6-25) and 7 (5-12) seconds, respectively (z=-10.934; P.001). The mean (SD) airway pressures were significantly different between the two groups (15.8 [1.9] and 14.9 [1.7] cm/H2O for Baska and I-gel, respectively; t=3.668; P.001). Seal pressure was not significantly different between the groups (0.08 [0.2] vs. 0.07 [0.2] cm/H2O in the Baska and I-gel groups, respectively, (t=1.35; P=.194). The Baska and I-gel masks are similar in most respects. Both have reasonably acceptable insertion times and can be used for selected surgical procedures. The requirement for more vigorous training is a limitation of the Baska mask. Results could differ with patients younger than 18 years of age or obese patients. None. Not registered.
机译:喉部面膜越来越多地用于代替在手术期间维护气道的气管插管或面部面罩。比较Baska和I-Gel Masks的插入时间和其他特征在接受泌尿科手术的全身麻醉患者中。随机控制,单盲研究。泌尿外科外科手术室的三级护理医院。我们注册了伴随的患者,其手术预计持续时间不到两个小时。在预介质和充足的放松之后,受试者随机分配给I-GEL面膜或巴斯卡面膜。计算机生成的随机数用于随机用密封的不透明信封进行分配隐藏。该研究的主要结果测量是喉部掩模气道(LMA)插入所需的时间。此外,设备放置尝试的数量,术后症状和症状的数量(咳嗽,呼吸持有,喉部痉挛,唇伤创伤,掩盖上的血液)和术后1和24小时的喉咽发病率分数。 211符合纳入标准,200名参与者完成了这项研究。与I-GEL相比,Baska掩模需要更长的插入时间,并且其气道压力较高。 LMA插入在Baska和I-凝胶基团中的中值(最小最大)持续时间分别为14(6-25)和7(5-12)秒(Z = -10.934; p <.001)。平均值(SD)气道压力在两组(15.8 [1.9]和14.9 [1.7] Cm / H 2 O)之间显着差异,分别为Baska和I-凝胶; T = 3.668; p <.001)。在基团之间(Baska和I-凝胶基团中的0.08 [0.07 [0.07 [0.07 [0.07 [0.2] cm / h 2 O]之间的密封压力没有显着差异(t = 1.35; p = .194)。巴斯卡和我 - 大多数方面都具有相似的凝胶面罩。两者都具有合理的可接受的插入时间,可用于选定的外科手术。对更加剧烈培训的要求是巴斯卡面膜的限制。结果可能与年龄超过18岁或肥胖的患者不同患者。没有。没有注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号