...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Saudi medicine. >Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism
【24h】

Cord blood versus heel-stick sampling for measuring thyroid stimulating hormone for newborn screening of congenital hypothyroidism

机译:脐带血与脚跟 - 粘附抽样,用于测量甲状腺刺激激素,用于新生儿筛查先天性甲状腺功能亢进症

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth. Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH. Comparative diagnostic accuracy. Tertiary care center in Riyadh. The study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 μU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation. Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates. 17 729 screened babies. Of 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%). Both cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice. Retrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature. None.
机译:使用脐带血或后跟样品的先天性甲状腺功能亢进(CH)筛选,认为预防长期并发症CH的必不可少的血液血液(CH)是必不可少的,这包括智力残疾和缓慢的增长。比较脐带血和后跟 - 粘附样品的敏感性和特异性,用于测定致甲状腺刺激激素(TSH)水平的检测。比较诊断准确性。利雅得的三级护理中心。该研究包括在2011年5月至2013年5月期间在此期间交付的所有婴儿。作为常规新生儿筛查的一部分,通过测量TSH水平,从每个新生儿中收集脐带血和后跟样品。如果TSH的浓度超过60 mIU / L和负数,则被认为是阳性的,如果少于30 miu / l。在30-60 mIU / L之间的任何绳索TSH水平被认为是邻接线,并且从相同的帘线样品中测量免费的T4。如果游离T4水平低于9 pmol / l,则结果被认为是阳性的。脚后跟TSH水平超过20μU/ L被认为是阳性的。召回所有具有阳性结果的新生儿,并考虑外周静脉样品进行TSH和Free T4进行确认。敏感性和特异性,正负预测值和召回率。 17 729筛选的婴儿。 17个729个筛选的新生儿,7例被诊断为具有原发性CH。通过帘线和后跟 - 棒TSH水平检测所有确诊的病例:88个帘线结果阳性(敏感性100%,特异性99.6%,召回率为0.04%)和305个脚背棒结果为阳性(敏感度100%,特异性98.3%,召回率为1.68%)。绳索和脚跟-kigt tsh测试都检测到所有CH的情况。由于召回速率较低,帘线测试优于脚跟杆测试。当脚跟棒难以或早期放电是实践时,我们认为电源线TSH测试是优选的。回顾;新生儿筛查对于TSH采样的时机为时过早。没有任何。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号