...
首页> 外文期刊>Archivos de Medicina (Manizales) >VO 2 Estimation equation accuracy to young adults
【24h】

VO 2 Estimation equation accuracy to young adults

机译:VO 2对年轻成年人的估计方程准确性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: analyze the agreement of the V?O2max values estimated by American College of Sports Medicine? and Foster equations with direct measure gas analyze in young Brazilian males. The maximal oxygen uptake, as a health indicator and mortality predictor, can be assessed in different ways. The gold standard comprises the direct measurement of exhaled gases, which entails high cost. A more conveniently form can be estimation equations. Materials and methods: this study assessed VO2max of 41 young Brazilian males (21.4 ±2.2 years) by cardiopulmonary exercise test in a treadmill ergometer with a ramp protocol. Bland and Altman analysis was performed to verify the agreement between V?O2max measured and estimated values by ACSM and Foster equations. Results: the measured VO2max was 52.3 ± 4.9 ml.kg-1.min-1. The difference between the measured V?O2max and the estimated V?O2max by the ACSM equation (9.40±3.67) was approximately 7.5 times greater than the difference between the measured V?O2max and estimated V?O2max by Foster’s equation (1.25±3.46). Bland Altman graphics shows that only ACSM equation had mean differences that were significantly different from the measured value. Conclusions: the ACSM equation showed not appropriate for during treadmill stress testing young adults in a ramp protocol and Foster equation seems to be a more accurate estimator of V?O2max for this population, besides showed a bias along the aerobic capacity, trending to overestimates and underestimates V?O2max of least and most fit people, respectively.
机译:目的:分析美国运动医学院估计的诉澳元价值的协议吗?并促进了在年轻巴西男性中直接测量天然气分析的方程。可以以不同的方式评估最大氧摄取,作为健康指标和死亡率预测因子。黄金标准包括直接测量呼出气体,这需要高成本。更方便的形式可以是估计方程。材料和方法:本研究评估了41名年轻巴西男性的vo2max(21.4±2.2岁),在跑步机中的跑步机中的心肺运动试验,具有斜坡方案。进行了平淡和Altman分析,以验证V-O2MAX之间的协议,通过ACSM和促进方程测量和估计值。结果:测量的vo2max为52.3±4.9 ml.kg-1.min-1。 ACSM等式(9.40±3.67)测量的VΔO2max和估计的VΔO2max之间的差异大约比测量的VΔO2max和估计的V 2估计的v?o2max的差异大约为7.5倍(1.25±3.46) 。 Bland Altman Graphics显示,只有ACSM方程具有与测量值显着不同的差异。结论:ACSM方程在斜坡方案中的跑步机应力测试期间不适合于斜坡协议,福斯特方程似乎是v?o2max的更准确的估算器,除了沿着好氧能力,趋势以高估和高估偏差低估了v?o2max至少,最适合的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号