首页> 外文期刊>Annals of laboratory medicine. >Genetic Counseling Status and Perspectives Based on a 2018 Professional Survey in Korea
【24h】

Genetic Counseling Status and Perspectives Based on a 2018 Professional Survey in Korea

机译:基于2018年韩国专业调查的基因遗传咨询状况与观点

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Genetic counseling (GC) provides many benefits, including the identification of patients appropriate for testing, patient education, and medical management. We evaluated the current status of and challenges faced by GC practitioners in Korean hospitals. Methods An electronic survey was designed and conducted in 52 certified laboratory physicians belonging to the Korean Society of Laboratory Medicine, from August to September 2018. The questionnaires addressed three main categories of information: (1) current status of GC in hospitals; (2) essential qualifications of GC practitioners; and (3) challenges and perspectives for GC. Fisher's exact test was applied to analyze categorical data. Results Among a total of 52 participants who initially responded, 12 (23.1%) were performing GC either by direct or indirect care. GC clinics were opened regularly for one (33.3%) or more than three sessions (25.0%) per week; most respondents spent more time for pre-visit activities than in-person visits, both for a initial visit patient and for a follow-up visit patient. All laboratory physicians provided genetic information to their patients. Most recommended family genetic testing when indicated (91.7%), discussed disease management (75.0%), and/or ordered additional genetic testing (58.3%), and some referred patients to other specialists (8.3%). Conclusions Both patients and laboratory physicians concede the advantage of GC performed by clinical geneticists; however, the practice of GC involves several challenges and raises some concerns. The cost and support required to implement GC need to be addressed in order to provide qualified GC in Korea.
机译:背景技术遗传咨询(GC)提供了许多益处,包括鉴定适合测试,患者教育和医疗管理的患者。我们评估了韩国医院GC从业者面临的现状和挑战。方法从2018年8月到9月属于朝鲜实验室医学的52次经验丰富的实验室医生设计和进行了电子调查。问卷讨论了三个主要的信息类别:(1)医院中GC的现状; (2)GC从业人员的基本资格; (3)GC的挑战和观点。使用Fisher的确切测试来分析分类数据。结果总共52名初始回应的参与者,12名(23.1%)通过直接或间接护理进行GC。 GC诊所每周定期打开一(33.3%)或超过三个季节(25.0%);大多数受访者在初次访问患者和后续访问患者中使用更多的时间来参观前参观活动。所有实验室医生都向其患者提供了遗传信息。大多数推荐的家庭遗传学测试(91.7%),讨论疾病管理(75.0%),和/或有序额外的遗传检测(58.3%),以及其他专家的患者(8.3%)。结论患者和实验室医生均通过临床遗传学家进行GC的优势;然而,GC的做法涉及几个挑战,并提出了一些问题。需要解决实施GC所需的成本和支持,以便在韩国提供合格的GC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号