首页> 外文期刊>Archives of public health >How do world and European standard populations impact burden of disease studies? A case study of disability-adjusted life years?(DALYs) in Scotland
【24h】

How do world and European standard populations impact burden of disease studies? A case study of disability-adjusted life years?(DALYs) in Scotland

机译:世界和欧洲标准人口如何影响疾病研究的负担?苏格兰残疾调整生活年份的案例研究?(Dalys)

获取原文
       

摘要

Background:Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) are an established method for quantifying population health needs and guiding prioritisation decisions. Global Burden of Disease (GBD) estimates aim to ensure comparability between countries and over time by using age-standardised rates (ASR) to account for differences in the age structure of different populations. Different standard populations are used for this purpose but it is not widely appreciated that the choice of standard may affect not only the resulting rates but also the rankings of causes of DALYs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the choice of standard, using the example of Scotland.Methods:DALY estimates were derived from the 2016 Scottish Burden of Disease (SBoD) study for an abridged list of 68 causes of disease/injury, representing a three-year annual average across 2014-16. Crude DALY rates were calculated using Scottish national population estimates. DALY ASRs standardised using the GBD World Standard Population (GBD WSP) were compared to those using the 2013 European Standard Population (ESP2013). Differences in ASR and in rank order within the cause list were summarised for all-cause and for each individual cause.Results:The ranking of causes by DALYs were similar using crude rates or ASR (ESP2013). All-cause DALY rates using ASR (GBD WSP) were around 26% lower. Overall 58 out of 68 causes had a lower ASR using GBD WSP compared with ESP2013, with the largest falls occurring for leading causes of mortality observed in older ages. Gains in ASR were much smaller in absolute scale and largely affected causes that operated early in life. These differences were associated with a substantial change to the ranking of causes when GBD WSP was used compared with ESP2013.Conclusion:Disease rankings based on DALY ASRs are strongly influenced by the choice of standard population. While GBD WSP offers international comparability, within-country analyses based on DALY ASRs should reflect local age structures. For European countries, including Scotland, ESP2013 may better guide local priority setting by avoiding large disparities occurring between crude and age-standardised results sets, which could potentially confuse non-technical audiences.? The Author(s). 2020.
机译:背景:残疾寿命年(DALYS)是一种规定量化人口健康需求和指导优先级决策的既定方法。全球疾病负担(GBD)估计旨在通过使用年龄标准化的汇率(ASR)确保国家与随着时间的推移的可比性,以考虑不同人群的年龄结构的差异。不同的标准群体用于此目的,但并不广泛地理解,标准的选择不仅可能影响导致的率,而且影响DALYS的原因排名。我们旨在使用苏格兰的举例来评估标准选择的影响。 - 2014 - 16年的年平均水平。利用苏格兰国家人口估计计算原油达利利率。使用2013年欧洲标准人口(ESP2013)的使用GBD世界标准人口(GBD WSP)标准化的DALY ASR。对于所有原因和每个单独的原因,总结了原因列表中ASR和等级顺序的差异。结果:DALYS的原因排名使用原油率或ASR(ESP2013)。使用ASR(GBD WSP)的全部原因DALY率降低了26%。总共58例,68个原因使用GBD WSP与ESP2013相比具有较低的ASR,最大的跌幅是在老年龄段观察到的死亡率的主要原因。 ASR的收益绝对规模小得多,并且在很大程度上受到影响的主要原因。当使用与ESP2013相比使用GBD WSP时,这些差异与原因排名的大量变化有关。结论:基于DALY ASR的疾病排名受到标准人群的选择受到强烈影响。虽然GBD WSP提供国际可比性,但基于DALY ASR的国家分析应反映当地时代结构。对于包括苏格兰,包括苏格兰的欧洲国家,ESP2013可以通过避免原油和年龄标准化结果之间发生的大差距来更好地指导局部优先设置,这可能会使非技术受众融为一体。作者。 2020。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号