...
首页> 外文期刊>Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control >Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections
【24h】

Estimating length of stay and inpatient charges attributable to hospital-acquired bloodstream infections

机译:估算归属于医院获得的血流感染的住宿时间和住院费用

获取原文
           

摘要

Hospital-acquired bloodstream infection (BSI) is associated with high morbidity and mortality and increases patients’ length of stay (LOS) and hospital charges. Our goals were to calculate LOS and charges attributable to BSI and compare results among different models. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in 2017 in a large general hospital, in Beijing. Using patient-level data, we compared the attributable LOS and charges of BSI with three models: 1) conventional non-matching, 2) propensity score matching controlling for the impact of potential confounding variables, and 3) risk set matching controlling for time-varying covariates and matching based on propensity score and infection time. The study included 118,600 patient admissions, 557 (0.47%) with BSI. Six hundred fourteen microorganisms were cultured from patients with BSI. Escherichia coli was the most common bacteria (106, 17.26%). Among multi-drug resistant bacteria, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) was the most common (42, 38.53%). In the conventional non-matching model, the excess LOS and charges associated with BSI were 25.06?days (P??0.05) and US$22041.73 (P??0.05), respectively. After matching, the mean LOS and charges attributable to BSI both decreased. When infection time was incorporated into the risk set matching model, the excess LOS and charges were 16.86?days (P??0.05) and US$15909.21 (P??0.05), respectively. This is the first study to consider time-dependent bias in estimating excess LOS and charges attributable to BSI in a Chinese hospital setting. We found matching on infection time can reduce bias.
机译:医院获得的血流感染(BSI)与高发病率和死亡率有关,增加患者的住宿时间(LOS)和医院费用。我们的目标是计算BSI归属的LOS和费用,并比较不同模型之间的结果。回顾性观察队列研究于2017年在北京大型综合医院进行。使用患者级数据,我们将BSI的归属LOS和收费与三种型号进行比较:1)传统的非匹配,2)倾向得分匹配控制潜在混淆变量的影响,以及3)风险集匹配控制的风险集控制基于倾向评分和感染时间改变协变量和匹配。该研究包括118,600名患者入学,557(0.47%),BSI。从BSI患者培养六百十四微生物。大肠杆菌是最常见的细菌(106,17.26%)。在多毒性细菌中,耐鲤鱼抗性肺杆菌(Crab)是最常见的(42,38.53%)。在传统的非匹配模型中,与BSI相关的过量洛杉矶和收费分别为25.06次(P?<0.05)和US $ 22041.73(p?<0.05)。匹配后,归属于BSI的平均洛杉矶和费用减少。当感染时间被纳入风险集匹配模型时,多余的LOS和收费分别为16.86?天(P?<0.05)和15909.21美元(p?<?0.05)。这是第一次考虑在中国医院环境中估计估计过度洛杉矶和收费的时间依赖偏见。我们发现对感染时间的匹配可以减少偏见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号