...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Medicine and Surgery >Ultrasound-versus visual-guided transversus abdominis plane block prior to transabdominal preperitoneal ingunial hernia repair. A retrospective cohort study
【24h】

Ultrasound-versus visual-guided transversus abdominis plane block prior to transabdominal preperitoneal ingunial hernia repair. A retrospective cohort study

机译:超声波与视觉引导的横向腹腹板腹部平面块在跨腹部素质腹腔内疝修复。回顾性队列研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundThe transversus abdominis plane block is a regional anesthesia technique. Recently, its impact on early chronic pain and the cumulative need of analgesic medication following inguinal hernia repair is being monitored. In terms of effectiveness and patient safety, it remains unclear whether the approach should be conducted preoperatively through ultrasound guidance, or through intraoperative visual guidance.The study at hand aims to provide more evidence on this topic.MethodsA monocentric retrospective matched pair analysis was performed. The intraoperative visual guided and ultrasound guided -transversus abdominis plane block prior to inguinal hernia repair in transabdominal preperitoneal technique were consecutively compared in regard to analgesic effectiveness and complication rate. The data of individuals who were operated on from June 2007 to February 2019 were analyzed. The matching criteria were ASA-Score, Gender, Age ( ±6 years), and hernia size (<1,5?cm, 1,5-3?cm, >1,5?cm).ResultsA total of 116 patients were enrolled. Both groups were homogenous in terms of age, gender contribution, body mass index, ASA-Score, hernia type, and size. The pain score at the postoperative anesthesia care unit was lower in the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane group without being statistically significant (VAS-Score: 0.67 vs.0.84). Patients of the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane group received significantly less metamizole on the day of operation (1.29?g (0.96) vs. 1.68?g (0.70), p?=?0.015).ConclusionDue to our findings, we assume that the ultrasound-guided-transversus abdominis plane -Block may reduce postoperative pain and analgesic consumption more effectively than the visual-guided-transversus abdominis plane lock. Further prospective clinical trials are mandatory.
机译:背景技术横向腹部平面块是一种区域麻醉技术。最近,正在监测其对早期慢性疼痛的影响和镇痛药物治疗后的镇痛药物修复后的累积需求。在有效性和患者安全方面,仍然目前尚不清楚这些方法是否应通过超声引导,或通过术中视觉指导进行术语。目的的研究旨在提供有关该主题的更多证据。方法进行了更多的证据。在镇痛效果和并发症率的情况下,连续比较了在腹腔内饲养术后腹腔内疝修复之前的术中视觉引导和超声引导 - 腹腹嵌段。分析了2007年6月至2019年2月运营的个人数据。匹配标准是ASA - 评分,性别,年龄(±6岁)和疝气大小(<1,5?cm,1,5-3厘米,> 1,5?cm)。患者共有116名患者注册。两组在年龄,性别贡献,体重指数,ASA - 评分,疝气类型和大小方面都是均匀的。术后麻醉护理单元的疼痛评分在超声引导 - 横向跨越腹部平面组中较低,而不存在统计学意义(VAS分数:0.67 Vs.0.84)。超声引导横向腹部腹部平面组的患者在操作日内得到显着较少的味道(1.29?G(0.96)与1.68?G(0.70),P?=?0.015)。到我们的研究结果,我们假设超声引导 - 横向腹部平面 - 腹板可以比视觉引导横向腹部平面锁更有效地减少术后疼痛和镇痛消费。进一步的前瞻性临床试验是强制性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号