首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Public Health >Does Over-the-Counter Purchase of Antihistamines by Residents of Dhaka City, Bangladesh Align with the Prescribing Choices of the Physicians Practicing in That City?
【24h】

Does Over-the-Counter Purchase of Antihistamines by Residents of Dhaka City, Bangladesh Align with the Prescribing Choices of the Physicians Practicing in That City?

机译:达卡市居民的抵抗抗组胺群落是否与孟加拉国的居民进行了对齐的是那个城市练习的医生的规定选择?

获取原文
       

摘要

Most current guidelines recommend prescribing second-generation antihistamines (SGAs) over first-generation antihistamines because SGAs are less likely to cause sedation and impairment of heavy work performance. However, common residents who use these antihistamines as over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are less likely to know that. So, this study was designed to compare the over-the-counter use of antihistamines by common residents with the prescribing preferences of physicians residing at Dhaka City, Bangladesh. Between June and August of 2017, a total of 100 Physicians from some of the top medical institutions of the city and 350 randomly selected common residents were directly interviewed with two separate semistructured questionnaires specifically designed for each population. Data was statistically analyzed using Fischer’s exact test, Spearman’s rank correlation test and Kendall’s tau rank correlation test. The data shows that physicians prefer second-generation antihistamines with fexofenadine (48.09% of the total responses), desloratadine (16.03%), and rupatadine (13.74%) taking the top spots. Cetirizine (29.46% of total responses), desloratadine (14.73%), and chlorpheniramine (14.52%) were the most used OTC antihistamines by the common residents. Statistical analysis with Fischer’s exact test revealed that the difference in preference of first-generation antihistamines between physicians and common residents were extremely significant (p0.0001). Furthermore, cetirizine (which is known to have some degree of sedating activity) and chlorpheniramine are more preferred among common residents than among physicians (extremely significant difference, p0.0001 in both cases). The study concludes that physicians of Dhaka City are complying with practice guidelines, but sedating antihistamines still retain some popularity among the common residents. Hence, a more engaging community pharmacy is needed to minimize adverse effects that can arise from OTC use of sedating antihistamines.
机译:大多数目前的指导方针建议在第一代抗组胺中规定第二代抗组胺药(SGAS),因为SGA不太可能导致镇静和沉重的工作表现的损害。然而,使用这些抗组胺药作为柜台(OTC)药物的常见居民不太可能知道。因此,本研究旨在比较普通居民的抗逆症的超越抗议者,并在孟加拉国达卡市的医师处方偏好。在2017年6月至8月期间,来自该市一些主要医疗机构的100名医生和350名随机选择的普通居民直接采访了专门为每人口专门设计的两个独立的半系统问卷。使用Fischer的精确测试,Spearman的等级相关测试和Kendall的Tau排名相关测试进行统计分析。该数据表明,医生更喜欢使用Fexofenadine的第二代抗组胺药(占总反应的48.09%),氯沙拉嘌呤(16.03%)和罗嘌呤(13.74%)取顶点。十六嗪(占总反应总量的29.46%),氯氰酸盐(14.73%)和氯啡胺(14.52%)是普通居民最常用的OTC抗组胺药。统计分析与费斯的确切试验显示,医生和常见居民之间第一代抗组胺瘤的偏好偏差极为显着(P <0.0001)。此外,普通居民中常见的居民中常见的居民中的柠檬嗪(已知有一定程度的镇静活性)和氯苯那嗪更优选(两种情况下P <0.0001)。该研究得出结论,达卡市的医生符合实践指导方针,但镇静抗组胺药仍然在普通居民之间留住了一些人气。因此,需要更具吸引力的社区药物来最小化来自OTC使用镇静抗组胺药可能产生的不利影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号