...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Orthopedics >Correlation between Findings in Physical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Nerve Conduction Studies in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation
【24h】

Correlation between Findings in Physical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Nerve Conduction Studies in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation

机译:腰椎椎间盘突出症腰椎间盘神经疗法地区体检,磁共振成像和神经传导研究的相关性

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose. The aim of this study was to find out the correlation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nerve conduction studies’ (NCS) findings in patients with lumbosacral radiculopathy caused by lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. In addition, the study aimed at finding the correlation between the clinical manifestations of lumbosacral radiculopathy and both MRI and NCS. Patients and Methods. The study was a cross-sectional analytic study which included thirty patients with a history suggestive of lumbosacral radiculopathy. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who had an MRI confirmed L4/5 and/or L5/S1 intervertebral disc prolapse in addition to one or more of the following (dermatomal distribution of symptoms appropriate with MRI level, presence of motor weakness, sensory impairment, absent ankle jerk, or positive straight leg raising test). All patients underwent clinical assessment and NCS, and their MRI examination was reviewed. The Chi-Squared/Fisher’s exact test was used to test the correlation. Results. There was a statistically significant correlation between abnormal physical findings and nerve root compression in MRI. Statistically significant correlation was neither found between abnormal physical examination findings and abnormal NCS nor between nerve root compression in MRI and abnormal NCS findings. Conclusion. Abnormal neurological examination findings can be used to predict nerve root compression in MRI examination. On the contrary, positive findings of physical examination do not predict abnormal NCS, as well as negative findings do not exclude abnormal NCS; therefore, it is useful to add NCS when MRI findings do not match clinical examination findings or when no neuroimaging abnormalities can be identified.
机译:目的。本研究的目的是在腰椎间盘突出症引起的腰骶神经病患者中找出磁共振成像(MRI)和神经传导研究'(NCS)结果之间的相关性。此外,该研究旨在找到腰骶神经病变的临床表现与MRI和NCS之间的相关性。患者和方法。该研究是一个横截面分析研究,包括患有历史的三十名患者暗示腰骶神经病变。纳入标准如下:具有MRI确认的患者,但除了以下一种或多种(适当于MRI水平的症状的皮肤分布,电机虚弱,感官损伤的存在,缺乏脚踝猛拉,或积极的直腿提升测试)。综述了所有接受临床评估和NC的患者及其MRI检查。 Chi-Squared / Fisher的确切测试用于测试相关性。结果。 MRI的异常物理发现与神经根压缩之间存在统计学上的相关性。统计学上显着的相关性既不在异常体检结果和异常NC之间发现,也没有在MRI和异常NCS调查结果中的神经根压缩之间。结论。异常神经检查结果可用于预测MRI检查中的神经根压缩。相反,体检的阳性结果不会预测NCS的异常,以及负面发现不排除异常NCS;因此,当MRI发现不匹配临床检查结果时,添加NCS是有用的,或者当没有识别神经成像异常时。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号