...
首页> 外文期刊>Advances in Interventional Cardiology: Postepy w Kardiologii Interwencyjnej >Stent loss in the radial artery – surgical vs. interventional approach – report of two cases
【24h】

Stent loss in the radial artery – surgical vs. interventional approach – report of two cases

机译:桡动脉 - 外科手术与介入方法的支架损失 - 两种病例报告

获取原文

摘要

Stent loss during coronary angioplasty is a?complication that can be managed in various manners; however, transradial access limits the options available. We describe two coronary interventions complicated by stent dislodgement, initially managed by pulling the stent back to the radial artery. Both stents were unwillingly lost on different levels in radial arteries. The first case was managed with a?direct radial artery cut-down because distal location made it a?quick and straightforward procedure. In the second case a?partially deployed stent was lost in the proximal part of the radial artery. It was rewired, deployed, and post-dilated with a?larger balloon. This enabled continuation of the procedure using the same access. Both cases were asymptomatic during 24 months of follow-up. It is crucial to avoid leaving artificial bodies in arteries supplying vital organs because stent-related thrombosis or stenosis may seriously compromise blood flow. Removing the stent via the introducer sheath should be considered the optimal treatment. Unfortunately, it is common that a?partially expanded stent will not pass through the sheath. The superficial location of the distal radial artery segment facilitates surgical cut-down with local anaesthesia. When dislodgement occurs in deeper segments of the radial artery, the benefits from cut-down seem to be less because the procedure might take more time and be more difficult – as in the presented case in which we decided to rewire and fully expand the stent in situ . Retrieval of the stent at all costs might have led to further complications; hence stent deployment may be a?good alternative to retrieval in such cases.
机译:冠状动脉血管成形术期间的支架损失是一个可以以各种方式管理的复杂性;但是,跨代访问限制了可用的选项。我们描述了两种冠状动脉的干预,其通过支架去解作用复杂,最初通过将支架拉回桡动脉来管理。两个支架在桡动脉的不同水平上不情感丧失。第一种案例用A?直接径向动脉削减,因为远端位置使其成为一种?快速和简单的程序。在第二种情况下,在桡动脉的近端部分丢失了α部分展开的支架。它被重新运行,部署,并用一个较大的气球延伸。这使得能够使用相同的访问继续执行该过程。两种病例在24个月后两种情况下是无症状的。避免在供应重要器官的动脉中留下人造尸体是至关重要的,因为与支架相关的血栓形成或狭窄可能会严重损害血液流动。通过导引器护套去除支架应该被认为是最佳的处理。不幸的是,常见的是,一个膨胀的支架不会穿过鞘。远端径向动脉段的浅表位置有助于与局部麻醉的手术减压。当移位发生在桡动脉的更深层段中时,减少截止的效果似乎减少,因为该程序可能需要更多的时间并且更困难 - 如我们决定重新绕步的所案例,完全扩大支架原地。所有费用的支架检索可能导致进一步的并发症;因此,在这种情况下,支架部署可能是一个?良好的检索替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号