...
首页> 外文期刊>Acute and critical care. >Inhalation sedation for postoperative patients in the intensive care unit: initial sevoflurane concentration and comparison of opioid use with propofol sedation
【24h】

Inhalation sedation for postoperative patients in the intensive care unit: initial sevoflurane concentration and comparison of opioid use with propofol sedation

机译:重症监护病房术后患者的吸入镇静:初始七氟醚浓度和阿片类药物与异丙酚镇静的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Although the use of volatile sedatives in the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing in Europe, it remains infrequent in Asia. Therefore, there are no clinical guidelines available. This study investigates the proper initial concentration of sevoflurane, a volatile sedative that induces a Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) score of –2 to –3, in patients who underwent head and neck surgery with tracheostomy. We also compared the amount of postoperative opioid consumption between volatile and intravenous (IV) sedation. Methods We planned a prospective study to determine the proper initial sevoflurane concentration and a retrospective analysis to compare postoperative opioid consumption between volatile sedation and propofol sedation. Patients scheduled for head and neck surgery with tracheostomy and subsequent postoperative sedation in the ICU were enrolled. Results In this prospective study, the effective dose 50 (ED50) of initial end-tidal sevoflurane concentration was 0.36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.60%), while the ED 95 was 0.69% (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.75%) based on isotonic regression methods. In this retrospective study, remifentanil consumption during postoperative sedation was significantly lower in the sevoflurane group (2.52±1.00 μg/kg/hr, P=0.001) than it was in the IV propofol group (3.66±1.30 μg/kg/hr). Conclusions We determined the proper initial end-tidal concentration setting of sevoflurane for patients with tracheostomy who underwent head and neck surgery. Postoperative sedation with sevoflurane appears to be a valid and safe alternative to IV sedation with propofol.
机译:背景技术虽然在重症监护室(ICU)中使用挥发性镇静剂在欧洲正在增加,但亚洲仍然不常见。因此,没有可用的临床指南。本研究调查了七氟醚的适当初始浓度,挥发性镇静剂,其诱导患有气管造影头颈手术的患者-2至-3的Richmond搅拌沉积量表(Rass)得分。我们还比较了挥发性和静脉注射(IV)镇静之间的术后阿片类药物量。方法我们计划了一项前瞻性研究,以确定适当的初始七氟醚浓度及回顾性分析,以比较挥发性镇静与异丙酚镇静之间的术后阿片类药物。患有治疗术治疗和颈部手术的患者,ICU中的气管造口术和随后的术后镇静。结果在该前瞻性研究中,初始末端氮素浓度的有效剂量50(ED50)为0.36%(95%置信区间[Ci],0.20至0.60%),而ED 95为0.69%(95%CI,基于等渗回归方法0.60至0.75%。在这项回顾性研究中,七氟醚基团术后镇静期间的雷丁丹尼尔消费显着降低(2.52±1.00μg/ kg / hr,p = 0.001),而不是IV位异丙酚基(3.66±1.30μg/ kg / hr)。结论我们确定了患有头颈手术的气管造口术患者的七氟醚的适当初始潮浓度设定。术后镇静与七氟醚似乎是与异丙酚的静脉镇静的有效和安全的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号