...
首页> 外文期刊>Cost Effectiveness Resource Allocation >Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent road traffic injuries in eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: new results from WHO-CHOICE
【24h】

Cost-effectiveness of strategies to prevent road traffic injuries in eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia: new results from WHO-CHOICE

机译:防止东部撒哈拉以南非洲和东南亚道路交通损伤的策略成本效益:由世卫组织选择的新结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Road safety has been receiving increased attention through the United Nations Decade of Action on Road Safety, and is also now specifically addressed in the sustainable development goals 3.6 and 11.2. In an effort to enhance the response to Road Traffic Injuries (RTIs), this paper aims to examine the cost effectiveness of proven preventive interventions and forms part of an update of the WHO-CHOICE programme. Generalized cost-effectiveness analysis (GCEA) approach was used for our analysis. GCEA applies a null reference case, in which the effects of currently implemented interventions are subtracted from current rates of burden, in order to identify the most efficient package of interventions. A population model was used to arrive at estimates of intervention effectiveness. All heath system costs required to deliver the intervention, regardless of payer, were included. Interventions are considered to be implemented for 100?years. The analysis was undertaken for eastern sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia. In Southeast Asia, among individual interventions, drink driving legislation and its enforcement via random breath testing of drivers at roadside checkpoints, at 80% coverage, was found to be the most cost-effective intervention. Moreover, the combination of “speed limits?+?random breath testing?+?motorcycle helmet use”, at 90% coverage, was found to be the most cost-effective package. In eastern sub-Saharan Africa, enforcement of speed limits via mobile/handheld cameras, at 80% coverage, was found to be the most cost-effective single intervention. The combination of “seatbelt use?+?motorcycle helmet use?+?speed limits?+?random breath testing” at 90% coverage was found to be the most cost-effective intervention package. This study presents updated estimates on cost-effectiveness of practical, evidence-based strategies that countries can use to address the burden of RTIs. The combination of individual interventions that enforces simultaneously multiple road safety measures are proving to be the most cost-effective scenarios. It is important to note, however, that, in addition to enacting and enforcing legislation on the risk factors highlighted as part of this paper, countries need to have a coordinated, multi-faceted strategy to improve road safety.
机译:道路安全通过联合国对道路安全行动十年来收到了更多的关注,现在在可持续发展目标3.6和11.2中也是专门的。为了加强对道路交通损伤(RTIS)的反应,本文旨在审查经过验证的预防性干预措施的成本效益,并成为世卫组织选择计划的更新的一部分。广义成本效益分析(GCEA)方法用于我们的分析。 GCEA应用了零参考案例,其中当前实施的干预的效果从当前负担率中减去,以确定最有效的干预措施。人口模型用于到达干预效果的估计。包括提供干预,无论支付者如何提供干预所需的所有荒地系统成本。干预措施被认为是100年的人。分析是为东撒哈拉以南非洲和东南亚的分析。在东南亚,在覆盖80%的覆盖范围内,在各个干预措施,饮酒驾驶立法及其对路边检查站的随机呼吸测试的执法,发现是最具成本效益的干预。此外,发现“速度限制?+?+?+?+?摩托车头盔使用”,90%的覆盖范围是最具成本效益的包装。在东部撒哈拉以南非洲,发现通过移动/手持式摄像机的速度限制,以80%的覆盖率,被认为是最具成本效益的单一干预。 “安全带使用?+?摩托车头盔使用?+?速度限制?+?随机呼吸测试”被发现是最具成本效益的干预套餐。本研究提出了更新的估计,各国可以用来解决RTI的负担的实用性,基于证据的策略的成本效益。同时强制执行多种道路安全措施的个人干预措施的结合被证明是最具成本效益的情况。但是,重要的是要注意,除了颁布和执行对作为本文的一部分突出的风险因素的立法之外,各国需要有一个协调,多方面的战略,以改善道路安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号