...
首页> 外文期刊>Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology >Methane Emission Factor in Italian Mediterranean Buffalo According to Production Management
【24h】

Methane Emission Factor in Italian Mediterranean Buffalo According to Production Management

机译:根据生产管理的意大利地中海布法罗的甲烷排放因子

获取原文

摘要

The environmental impact of greenhouse gases caused by livestock farms plays a fundamental role due to the implications and environmental consequences that livestock practices entail, affecting the stability of the entire ecosystem connected to them, especially as a consequence of the growing demand for products of animal origin. The aim of this work was to quantify the CH 4 emissions factor in lactating buffaloes by comparing four different types of livestock management: family, conventional, organic and sustainable. To determine the enteric CH 4 emissions from buffalo, information about animal production and farm management was analyzed, and the CH 4 emission factor was calculated using the IPCC Tier 2 model. ANOVA was conducted to evaluate significant differences between the farms; Pearson’s correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between parameters. In a conventional farm, the CH 4 emission factor for buffalo was 27.69 kg CH 4 /head/yr compared to 22.77 and 21.61 kg CH 4 /head/yr respectively for organic and family-run. These data may also depend on the higher protein and fiber content in the administered unifeed. Furthermore, the ratio of enteric emissions factor of CH 4 / gross energy intake ratio reflected these data (12.04 vs 10.93 vs 10.16 vs 10.65 for conventional, organic, sustainable, and family-run farms, respectively).
机译:由于畜牧业实践所带来的影响和环境后果,影响了牲畜农场的温室气体对温室气体的环境影响起着基本作用,影响了与他们的整个生态系统的稳定性,特别是由于对动物来源的不断增长的需求而导致。这项工作的目的是通过比较四种不同类型的牲畜管理:家庭,常规,有机和可持续的四种不同类型的牲畜管理来量化CH 4排放因子。要确定水牛的肠道CH 4排放,分析了有关动物生产和农业管理的信息,并使用IPCC第2层模型计算了CH 4排放因子。进行ANOVA以评估农场之间的显着差异; Pearson的相关性用于评估参数之间的关系。在常规农场中,缓冲器的CH 4排放因子分别为22.77千克4 / yr,分别为22.77和21.61 kg 4 / head / Yr,用于有机和家庭。这些数据还可以取决于施用悬浮液中的较高蛋白质和纤维含量。此外,CH 4 /总能量摄入比的肠道排放因子的比例反映了这些数据(分别为常规,有机,可持续和家庭经营的农场的12.04 vs 10.93与10.65 vs 10.65。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号