...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine: journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London >What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies
【24h】

What do senior physicians think about AI and clinical decision support systems: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of data from specialty societies

机译:高级医生如何考虑AI和临床决策支持系统:特种社会数据的定量和定性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

AIMS:The aim was to help physicians engage with NHS and other policymakers about the use, procurement and regulation of artificial intelligence, algorithms and clinical decision support systems (CDSS) in the NHS by identifying the professional benefits of and concerns about these systems.METHODS:We piloted a three-page survey instrument with closed and open-ended questions on SurveyMonkey, then circulated it to specialty societies via email. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to analyse responses.RESULTS:The results include the current usage of CDSS; identified benefits; concerns about quality; concerns about regulation, professional practice, ethics and liability, as well as actions being taken by the specialty societies to address these; and aspects of CDSS quality that need to be tested.CONCLUSION:While results confirm many expected benefits and concerns about CDSS, they raise new professional concerns and suggest further actions to explore with partners on behalf of the physician community.
机译:目的:目的是通过识别这些系统的专业利益,帮助医生与NHS和其他政策制定者与NHS和其他政策制定者聘用NHS中的人工智能,算法和临床决策支持系统(CDSS)。方法。方法:我们试图通过关于Surveymonkey的关闭和开放的问题,然后通过电子邮件将其传播给专业社会。定量和定性方法都用于分析响应。结果:结果包括CDS的当前使用;确定的福利;对质量的担忧;关于规定,专业实践,道德和责任的担忧,以及专业社会应对这些行动的行动;以及需要测试的CDSS质量的方面。结论:虽然结果证实了许多预期的效益和对CDS的担忧,但他们提出了新的专业问题,并提出了与合作伙伴代表医生社区的进一步行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号