...
首页> 外文期刊>ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research >Follow-up analysis of federal process of care data reported from three acute care hospitals in rural Appalachia
【24h】

Follow-up analysis of federal process of care data reported from three acute care hospitals in rural Appalachia

机译:三种急性护理医院在农村阿巴拉契亚报告的联邦护理数据进程的后续分析

获取原文

摘要

Background: This investigation evaluated standardized process of care data collected on selected hospitals serving a remote rural section of westernmost North Carolina. Methods: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were analyzed retrospectively for multiple clinical parameters at Fannin Regional Hospital, Murphy Medical Center, and Union General Hospital. Data were analyzed by paired t -test for individual comparisons among the three study hospitals to compare the three facilities with each other, as well as with state and national average for each parameter. Results: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services “Hospital Compare” data from 2011 showed Fannin Regional Hospital to have significantly higher composite scores on standardized clinical process of care measures relative to the national average, compared with Murphy Medical Center ( P = 0.01) and Union General Hospital ( P = 0.01). This difference was noted to persist when Fannin Regional Hospital was compared with Union General Hospital using common state reference data ( P = 0.02). When compared with national averages, mean process of care scores reported from Murphy Medical Center and Union General Hospital were both lower but not significantly different (?3.44 versus ?6.07, respectively, P = 0.54). Conclusion: The range of process of care scores submitted by acute care hospitals in western North Carolina is considerable. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services “Hospital Compare” information suggests that process of care measurements at Fannin Regional Hospital are significantly higher than at either Murphy Medical Center or Union General Hospital, relative to state and national benchmarks. Further investigation is needed to determine what impact these differences in process of care may have on hospital volume and/or market share in this region. Additional research is planned to identify process of care trends in this demographic and geographically rural area.
机译:背景:本调查评估了在最西部北卡罗来纳州的遥远的农村区供应的所选医院收集的护理数据的标准化过程。方法:回顾性法医院和医疗补助服务数据的临床参数,在法林地区医院,墨菲医疗中心和联盟综合医院分析了医疗保险服务数据。通过配对的T -TEST进行分析数据,以便为三个研究医院中的个人比较,以彼此相互比较三个设施,以及每个参数的国家和国家平均水平。结果:Medicare和Medicaid Services“医院比较”数据从2011年的数据显示,与墨菲医疗中心(P = 0.01)和联盟相比一般医院(P = 0.01)。当使用常规状态参考数据与联盟综合医院进行比较时,持续存在这种差异(P = 0.02)。与国家平均数相比,墨菲医疗中心和联盟综合医院报告的护理成分的平均过程均较低但没有显着差异(?3.44与Δ6.07,P = 0.54)。结论:北卡罗来纳州西部急性护理医院提交的护理成绩范围很大。 Medicare和Medicaid Services的中心“医院比较”信息表明,法宁地区医院的护理措施的过程明显高于墨菲医疗中心或联盟综合医院,相对于国家和国家基准。需要进一步调查以确定这些地区的医院数量和/或市场份额可能存在的影响。计划额外研究识别该人群和地理乡村地区的护理趋势进程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号