首页> 外文期刊>Clinical Epidemiology >Assessment Causality in Associations Between Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Schizophrenia: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study
【24h】

Assessment Causality in Associations Between Serum Uric Acid and Risk of Schizophrenia: A Two-Sample Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study

机译:血清尿酸与精神分裂症风险的协会评估因果关系:一种双样本双向孟德尔随机化研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: Although increasing lines of evidence showed associations between serum uric acid (UA) levels and schizophrenia, the causality and the direction of the associations remain uncertain. Thus, we aimed to assess whether the relationships between serum UA levels and schizophrenia are causal and to determine the direction of the association. Patients and Methods: Two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses and various sensitivity analyses were performed utilizing the summary data from genome-wide association studies within the Global Urate Genetics Consortium and the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. Secondary MR analyses in both directions were conducted within summary data using genetic risk scores (GRSs) as instrumental variables. Results: Three MR methods provided no causal relationship between serum UA and schizophrenia. Furthermore, GRS approach showed similar results in the three MR methods after adjustment for heterogeneity. By contrast, inverse variance weighted method, weighted median and GRS approach suggested a causal effect of schizophrenia risk on serum UA after adjustment for heterogeneity (per 10-symmetric percentage increase in schizophrenia risk, beta: ? 0.039, standard error (SE): 0.013, P = 0.003; beta: ? 0.036, SE: 0.018, P = 0.043; beta: ? 0.039, SE: 0.013, P = 0.002; respectively). Moreover, in both directions’ analyses, the heterogeneity and sensitivity tests suggested no strong evidence of bias due to pleiotropy. Conclusion: Schizophrenia may causally affect serum UA levels, whereas the causal role of serum UA concentrations in schizophrenia was not supported by our MR analyses. These findings suggest that UA may be a useful potential biomarker for monitoring treatment or diagnosis of schizophrenia rather than a therapeutic target for schizophrenia.
机译:目的:虽然增加了血清尿酸(UA)水平和精神分裂症之间的关联,但协会的因果关系仍然不确定。因此,我们旨在评估血清UA水平和精神分裂症之间的关系是否是因果的,并确定联想的方向。患者及方法:利用全球尿酸盐遗传学联盟和精神科学基因组联盟的基因组关联研究中的摘要数据进行两样样品分析和各种敏感性分析。两个方向上的次要MR分析在使用遗传风险评分(GRS)作为工具变量的摘要数据中进行。结果:三种MR方法不提供血清UA和精神分裂症之间的因果关系。此外,GRS方法在调整后三种MR方法中显示出类似的结果。相比之下,反方差加权方法,加权中值和GRS方法表明,在对异质性调整后的精神分裂症风险的因果效果(精神分裂症风险的每10次对称百分比增加,Beta:0.039,标准误差(SE):0.013 ,p = 0.003;β:0.036,SE:0.018,p = 0.043;β:0.039,SE:0.013,p = 0.002;分别为0.013,p = 0.002;此外,在两个方向的分析中,异质性和敏感性测试表明,由于肺炎而言,没有强有力的偏见证据。结论:精神分裂症可能因导致血清UA水平影响,而我们的MR分析不支持精神分裂症中血清UA浓度的因果作用。这些发现表明,UA可以是用于监测精神分裂症的治疗或诊断的有用潜在的生物标志物,而不是精神分裂症的治疗靶标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号