首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >The accreditation role of Councils on Chiropractic Education as part of the profession's journey from craft to allied health profession: a commentary
【24h】

The accreditation role of Councils on Chiropractic Education as part of the profession's journey from craft to allied health profession: a commentary

机译:委员会对脊椎按摩疗教育的认证作用,作为专业从工艺到盟军卫生职业的一部分:评论

获取原文
       

摘要

Chiropractors see themselves as well positioned to provide safe, effective and economical care for the on-going financial burden that spinal pain imposes. However, in many places of the world, the chiropractic profession continues to find itself struggling to gain acceptance as a mainstream allied health care provider. There is evidence of the existence of undesirable chiropractic practice patterns and it is in part due to some of the world’s accredited chiropractic programs. This indicated a need for scrutiny of international chiropractic educational accreditation standards, which are the responsibility of Councils on Chiropractic Education (CCEs). To this end we reviewed an emerging body of evidence about the chiropractic educational system in order to identify issues and make recommendations that may enhance professional acceptance through improved graduate outcomes and hopefully the quality of patient care. This commentary summarises the findings of that research. We reviewed recent relevant studies, including our own, into the role and function of CCEs and found that there is sufficient evidence to identify areas of concern that could be addressed, at least in part, by improvements to CCEs’ educational standards and processes. Areas included a lack of definitions for key terms such as, ‘chiropractic’, ‘diagnosis’, and ‘competency’, without which there can be no common understanding at a detailed level to inform graduate competencies and standards for a matching scope of practice. Further, there is some evidence to suggest that in some cases this level of detail is avoided in order to enable a “big tent” approach that allows for a diversity of approaches to clinical care to co-exist. This combined with the held view that chiropractic is “unique”, highly valued, and best understood by other chiropractors, explains how students and practitioners can cling to ‘traditional’ thinking. This has implications for public safety and patient quality of care. If chiropractic care is to gain mainstream acceptance worldwide then it needs to adopt, through revitalised CCE accreditation standards and processes, those of other allied healthcare professions and wholeheartedly embrace science, evidence-based practice and patient centred care.
机译:脊椎按摩师认为自己也能够为脊柱疼痛施加的持续的经济负担提供安全,有效和经济的照顾。然而,在世界的许多地方,脊椎按摩疗法继续发现自己正在努力获得受理作为主流盟国医疗保健提供者。有证据表明存在不良的脊椎按摩疗法实践模式,部分原因是世界上一些认可的脊椎按摩术计划。这表明需要审查国际脊椎按摩术教育认证标准,这是核使脊椎按摩教育(CCE)的责任。为此,我们审查了关于脊椎按摩疗法教育系统的新兴的证据,以确定通过改进毕业生成果,并希望患者护理质量提高专业接受的建议。这项评论总结了该研究的结果。我们审查了最近的相关研究,包括我们自己的CCE的作用和功能,发现有足够的证据来确定可以通过改善对CCE教育标准和流程来解决的关注领域。由于“脊椎按摩术”,“诊断”和“竞争力”,其中关键术语缺乏定义,没有任何常见的理解,以便为匹配范围的竞争范围提供信息,以告知研究生能力和标准。此外,存在一些证据表明,在某些情况下,避免这种细节水平,以便能够实现“大帐篷”方法,其允许临床护理的临床护理方法的多样性。这与持有的视图相结合,脊椎按摩疗法是“独特的”,高度重视,并得到其他脊椎按摩师的最佳理解,解释了学生和从业者如何坚持“传统”思维。这对公共安全和患者的护理质量有影响。如果脊椎按摩疗法是在全球范围内获得主流验收,那么它需要通过振兴CCE认证标准和流程,其他联盟医疗保健行业和全心全意地拥抱科学,基于证据的实践和患者的中心护理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号