首页> 外文期刊>Central European Business Review >Changes in Economic Sentiment Indicators before and after Economic Crisis (Position of Visegrad Group and Germany in EU)
【24h】

Changes in Economic Sentiment Indicators before and after Economic Crisis (Position of Visegrad Group and Germany in EU)

机译:经济危机前后经济情绪指标的变化(VISEGRAD集团和欧盟德国的地位)

获取原文
       

摘要

Confidence factors play an important role not only in the assessment of business cycles but also in the evaluation of national competitiveness (e.g. the Global Competitiveness report published by the World Economic Forum) due to both using soft data obtained from opinion surveys. The subjective nature of confidence leads to questions about the soundness of such findings. Since the answers from opinion surveys are subjective, the empirical relationship between sentiment indicators and economic variables is not unambiguously established. In these conditions, the results of business surveys and the findings published by competitiveness rankings should not be accepted unconditionally. This paper starts with the comparison of soft data (respondents' sentiment) assessing the quality of institutions among world regions in the Global Competitiveness Report 2017-18. The aim of this paper is to offer a more precise view of the development of economic sentiment in the EU countries, especially in Germany and the Visegrad group countries (the V4). As tools for this description, a business sentiment indicator (ESI) and confidence indicators were applied. For analysis of changes in business sentiment and respondents' confidence, a graphical examination of variables, correlation analysis, changes in standard deviation, changes in countries' ranking, and the comparison of average sentiment (confidence) in the pre-crisis and the post-crisis period were used. Our analysis indicates the equivalent of the so-called halo effect in the pre-crisis period for the V4 (the positive expectation connected with the EU accession) and the deterioration in sentiment and confidence indicators in the post-crisis period.
机译:信心不仅在评估商业周期中的评估中的重要作用,而且在对国家竞争力的评估(例如,世界经济论坛出版的全球竞争力报告)中起着重要作用,这两者都使用从观点调查中获得的软数据。信心的主观性质导致关于这种发现的健全性的问题。由于意见调查的答案是主观的,因此情绪指标与经济变量之间的经验关系不是明确的建立。在这些条件下,不应无条件地接受业务调查结果和竞争力排名出版的调查结果。本文从软数据(受访者情绪)的比较开始,评估全球竞争力报告2017-18世界地区的机构质量。本文的目的是提供更精确的欧盟国家经济情绪发展观点,特别是在德国和VISEGRAD集团国家(V4)。作为本说明书的工具,应用了商业情绪指标(ESI)和置信指示。用于分析商业情绪和受访者信心的变化,对变量的图形检查,相关性分析,标准偏差的变化,国家排名的变化,以及危机前的平均情感(信心)的比较和职位使用危机期。我们的分析表明,在危机前期(与欧盟加入的正期期间的正期期间)和危机后期的情绪恶化的恶化,我们的分析表明了在危机前期间的所谓晕效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号