首页> 外文期刊>Cardio-oncology. >An international survey of healthcare providers’ knowledge of cardiac complications of cancer treatments
【24h】

An international survey of healthcare providers’ knowledge of cardiac complications of cancer treatments

机译:医疗保健提供商对癌症治疗的心脏并发症的知识国际调查

获取原文
       

摘要

Cardio-oncology is a young sub-specialty that addresses the needs of cancer patients at risk of, or who have experienced cancer therapy related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). This study assessed clinicians’ understanding of cardio-oncology, opinions towards current practice, and approach to diagnosing and managing CTRCD. A 45-question survey was administered online via Survey Monkey and WeChat to health care providers (HCPs) comprising of cardiologists, oncologists, and others from September 2017 to March 2018. Implementation of the survey followed a modified Dillman’s Total Design Method. In total, 160 responses were collected from 22 countries; majority were from cardiologists (53.8%) and oncologists (32.5%). The remaining 13.7% identified themselves as “others,” including general internists, cardio-oncologists, pediatric oncologists, radiation oncologists, cardiac rehabilitation therapists, nurse practitioners, research students, and pharmacists. In the setting of metastatic cancer, there was a difference in risk tolerance for cardiotoxicity between subspecialties. In this case, more cardiologists (36.7%) accepted a 5–10% risk of cardiotoxicity compared to oncologists (20.0%). Majority of cardiologists felt that cardiotoxicity should be monitored, even in asymptomatic cancer patients (55.8%). Only 12% of oncologists selected this response. In contrast, 50.0% of oncologists reported that cardiologists should be involved only when patients develop cardiotoxicity. In comparison, 6.5% of cardiologists selected this response. Majority of cardiologists stated that cardio-oncology clinics would significantly improve cancer patients’ prognosis (88.3%); only 45.8% of oncologists shared this opinion. Of all respondents, 66.9% stated they were familiar with a variety of international guidelines for managing cardiotoxicity. Of all oncologists, 65.3% indicated that they referred to these guidelines for clinical decision making. Despite the growth of cardio-oncology clinics, there are significant knowledge gaps regarding prevention and treatment strategies for CTRCD among health care providers. Knowledge translation from guidelines and collaboration between cardiologists and oncologists are needed to improve cardiovascular outcomes of cancer patients.
机译:心脏肿瘤学是一种年轻的次级专业,解决了癌症患者的需求,受到有经验的癌症治疗相关心脏功能障碍(CTRCD)。本研究评估了临床医生对心血管肿瘤学的理解,对目前做法的意见,以及诊断和管理CTRCD的方法。通过调查猴子和微信在2017年9月至2018年3月的医疗保健提供者(HCP)上网,通过调查猴和微信管理45张调查。该调查的实施遵循了改进的迪尔曼的总设计方法。共有160个响应,从22个国家收集;大多数来自心脏病学家(53.8%)和肿瘤学家(32.5%)。其余的13.7%被认为自己是“其他人”,包括一般内科医生,心脏肿瘤学家,小儿肿瘤学家,辐射肿瘤学家,心脏康复治疗师,护士从业者,研究生和药剂师。在转移性癌症的设置中,亚特色之间的心脏毒性存在风险耐受性差异。在这种情况下,与肿瘤学家(20.0%)相比,更多的心脏病学家(36.7%)接受了5-10%的心脏毒性风险。大多数心脏病学家认为,即使在无症状癌症患者中,也应该监测心脏毒性(55.8%)。只有12%的肿瘤科医生选择了这个回复。相比之下,50.0%的肿瘤科医生报告说心脏病学家只有当患者发育心脏毒性时都应该参与。相比之下,6.5%的心脏病学家选择了这一响应。大多数心脏病学家表示,心肌诊所会显着改善癌症患者的预后(88.3%);只有45.8%的肿瘤科医师分享了这种意见。在所有受访者中,66.9%表示他们熟悉各种管理心脏毒性的国际准则。在所有肿瘤学家中,65.3%表示他们提到了这些临床决策指南。尽管心脏肿瘤科学诊所的增长,但有关医疗保健提供者中的CTRCD的预防和治疗策略存在重大知识差距。需要心理学家和肿瘤学家之间的指导和协作的知识翻译,以改善癌症患者的心血管结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号