...
首页> 外文期刊>Cardiology Journal >“Shock-Pella”: Combined management of an undilatable ostial left circumflex stenosis in a complex high-risk interventional procedure patient
【24h】

“Shock-Pella”: Combined management of an undilatable ostial left circumflex stenosis in a complex high-risk interventional procedure patient

机译:“Shock-Pella”:在复杂的高风险介入程序患者中综合治疗无可拆性的左侧左环狭窄

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A 67-year-old woman with stage 4 chronic kidney disease, implantable cardioverter-defibrillatorand a history of multiple coronary interventions,both percutaneous (stenting of anterior descending artery [LAD], ramus and right coronary artery[RCA]) and surgical left internal mammary artery[LIMA] graft on LAD and saphenous vein grafts[SVG] on ramus and RCA), was admitted becauseof congestive heart failure with evidence of severe left ventricular ejection fraction decrease(25%). Coronary angiography showed occludedLIMA and SVG to ramus, patent SVG to RCA anda critical ostial left circumflex artery (LCx) stenosis(Fig. 1A). Since myocardial perfusion scintigraphy showed no viability on anterior wall and apex(Fig. 1B), a protected LCx lesion revascularizationwas attempted, positioning a circulatory mechanical support (Impella CP; Abiomed, Danvers, MA).Non-compliant balloons did not fully expand duringlesion predilatation, probably due to severe fibrocalcification and protruding ramus stent struts (intravascular ultrasound catheter did not cross the lesion) (Fig. 1C). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) wasthen performed (Shockwave Medical, Fremont,CA), inflating a 3.0 × 12 mm balloon (at 4–6 atmfor 8 cycles of 10 pulses each) with angiographicevidence of complete device expansion (Fig. 1D)and subsequent optimal lesion predilation withnon-compliant balloon (Fig. 1E). A 3.5 × 15 mmdrug-eluting stent was successfully implanted(Fig. 1F). This is a case of complex, high-riskinterventional procedure managed with combinedstrategy “Impella-assisted IVL” to prevent the riskof hemodynamic compromise in a time-demandingprocedure where an optimal and aggressive lesiondebulking was required.
机译:一名67岁的女性患有第4阶段的慢性肾病,可植入的心脏病 - 除颤器和多种冠状动脉干预的历史,既经皮(前期下降动脉的支架[LAD],RAMUS和右冠状动脉[RCA])和外科手术乳房动脉膜在LAD和隐静脉移植物(RAMU和RCA上)的移植物,由于充血性心力衰竭,具有严重的左心室喷射分数的证据(25%)。冠状动脉造影显示Occludedlima和Svg至Ramus,专利SVG至RCA和临界左旋环形动脉(LCX)狭窄(图1A)。由于心肌灌注闪烁的闪烁扫描在前壁和顶点上没有可活力(图1B),所以试图进行受保护的LCX病变血运重建,定位循环机械支撑(Impla CP;附属,Danvers,MA)。符合标准的气球在lex中没有完全扩展蠕动,可能是由于严重的纤维钙化和突出的拉姆斯支架支柱(血管内超声导管没有穿过病变)(图1C)。血管内碎石术(IVL)是进行的(Shockwave Medical,Fremont,CA),膨胀了3.0×12毫米的球囊(在4-6个次次循环的10个10个脉冲),具有完整装置扩展的血管造影程度(图1D)和随后的最佳符合符合标准的球囊的病变序列(图1E)。成功植入了3.5×15 MMDRUG洗脱支架(图1F)。这是一种复杂的高风险性程序的情况,与组合的刽子氏“辅助IVL”管理,以防止血液动力学妥协在时间QuandingProcedure中需要血液动力学折衷,其中需要最佳和侵略性的Lesiondeburking。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号