...
首页> 外文期刊>Balkan Medical Journal >Oral Immunotherapy for Cow’s Milk Allergy: Five Years’ Experience from a Single Center in Turkey
【24h】

Oral Immunotherapy for Cow’s Milk Allergy: Five Years’ Experience from a Single Center in Turkey

机译:用于牛奶过敏的口服免疫疗法:来自土耳其的单一中心的五年经验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy is an effective treatment option because of its ability to increase the threshold for clinical reactions. Aims: To present our experience of oral immunotherapy for cow’s milk allergy in the pediatric allergy outpatient clinic, and to evaluate the long-term efficacy of oral immunotherapy and risk factors for adverse reactions during oral immunotherapy. Study Design: Single-center retrospective cohort study. Methods: Forty-two patients with Immunoglobulin-E-mediated cow’s milk allergy who complied with the oral immunotherapy protocol were evaluated in this study. The treatment consisted of a rapid escalation phase with an oral food challenge step that included milk doses. During the build-up phase, increasing quantities of cow’s milk were administered until the patient was able to consume 200 mL of cow’s milk daily. Results: The mean age of starting the oral immunotherapy was 40.2±3.2 (range, 36-156) months, and 54.8% (n=23) of the patients were males. The mean duration of the build-up phase was 18.1±5.6 (range, 9-41) weeks, and the mean maintenance phase was 29.1±11.6 (range, 12-63) months. During the oral immunotherapy, 36 adverse reactions (78% mild and 22% moderate) occurred in 16 (38%) patients. There were no differences in the age of starting the oral immunotherapy (p=0.19), cow’s milk-specific Immunoglobulin-E levels (p=0.17), and cumulative provocative doses of oral food challenges (p=0.78) between the two groups of patients with and without adverse reactions. The wheal diameters to cow’s milk were higher in the group with adverse reactions (p=0.03). There was no difference in the oral immunotherapy onset age between patients with and without a history of anaphylaxis (p=0.38). The patients with a history of anaphylaxis had more adverse reactions (p=0.04) and a higher number of reactions during the oral immunotherapy (p=0.01), and a higher mean duration of the up-dosing phase (p=0.04) compared with patients without anaphylaxis. Conclusion: Oral immunotherapy is a treatment option in patients with cow’s milk allergy because of its high efficacy. Adverse reactions occur in about 40% of cases and are mostly mild. It should be administered with caution to patients with a history of anaphylaxis and a higher wheal diameter to cow’s milk in the skin prick test.
机译:背景:牛奶过敏的口腔免疫疗法是一种有效的治疗选择,因为它能够增加临床反应的阈值。目的:展示我们对儿科过敏门诊诊所的牛奶过敏的口服免疫疗法经验,并评估口服免疫治疗的长期疗效和口服免疫治疗不良反应的影响。研究设计:单中心回顾队列队列研究。方法:本研究评估了符合符合口服免疫疗法议定书的42例免疫球蛋白-E介导的牛奶过敏患者。治疗包括快速升级阶段,口服食物挑战步骤包括牛奶剂量。在建设阶段,施用牛奶的增加,直到患者能够每天消耗200毫升牛奶。结果:开始口服免疫疗法的平均年龄为40.2±3.2(范围36-156)个月,54.8%(n = 23)患者是男性。累积阶段的平均持续时间为18.1±5.6(范围,9-41)周,平均维持阶段为29.1±11.6(范围,12-63)个月。在口服免疫疗法期间,16名(38%)患者发生了36例不良反应(78%温和和22%中等)。开始口服免疫疗法(P = 0.19)的年龄没有差异,牛的牛奶特异性免疫球蛋白-E水平(p = 0.17),两组的累积促进剂量的口腔食物挑战(p = 0.78)患者患有且没有不良反应的患者。在牛奶中的牛奶中的大直径在不良反应中较高(p = 0.03)。在没有过敏术病史的患者之间的口服免疫疗法发作年龄没有差异(P = 0.38)。过敏症史的患者具有更高的不良反应(P = 0.04)和口服免疫疗法期间的反应较多(P = 0.01),与较高的加剂量相比(p = 0.04)的平均持续时间相比没有过敏反应的患者。结论:口服免疫疗法是牛奶过敏患者的治疗选择,因为它的疗效高。不良反应发生在约40%的病例中,并且大多是温和的。谨慎给患有过敏反应历史的患者和牛奶在皮肤刺试验中给予患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号