...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >A two arm randomized controlled trial comparing the short and long term effects of an elimination diet and a healthy diet in children with ADHD (TRACE study). Rationale, study design and methods
【24h】

A two arm randomized controlled trial comparing the short and long term effects of an elimination diet and a healthy diet in children with ADHD (TRACE study). Rationale, study design and methods

机译:一项双臂随机对照试验,比较消除饮食的短期和长期影响,以及患有ADHD的儿童的健康饮食(痕量研究)。理由,研究设计和方法

获取原文

摘要

Food may trigger Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Therefore, an elimination diet (ED) might be an effective treatment for children with ADHD. However, earlier studies were criticized for the nature of the control group, potential confounders explaining the observed effects, unsatisfactory blinding, potential risks of nutritional deficiencies and unknown long term and cost-effectiveness. To address these issues, this paper describes the rationale, study design and methods of an ongoing two arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the short (5?week) and long term (1?year) effects of an elimination diet and a healthy diet compared with care as usual (CAU) in children with ADHD. A total of N?=?162 children (5–12?years) with ADHD will be randomized to either an ED or a healthy diet. A comparator arm including N?=?60 children being solely treated with CAU (e.g. medication) is used to compare the effects found in both dietary groups. The two armed RCT is performed in two youth psychiatry centers in the Netherlands, with randomization within each participating center. The primary outcome measure is response to treatment defined as a?≥?30% reduction on an ADHD DSM-5 rating scale (SWAN) and/or on an emotion dysregulation rating scale (SDQ: dysregulation profile). This is assessed after 5 weeks of dietary treatment, after which participants continue the diet or not. Secondary outcome measures include the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observational Schedule (DB-DOS), parent and teacher ratings of comorbid symptoms, cognitive assessment (e.g. executive functions), school functioning, physical measurements (e.g. weight), motor activity, sleep pattern, food consumption, nutritional quality of the diet, adherence, parental wellbeing, use of health care resources and cost-effectiveness. Assessments take place at the start of the study (T0), after five weeks (T1), four months (T2), eight months (T3) and 12?months of treatment (T4). T0, T1 and T4 assessments take place at one of the psychiatric centers. T2 and T3 assessments consist of filling out online questionnaires by the parents only. This RCT will likely contribute significantly to clinical practice for ADHD by offering insight into the feasibility, nutritional quality, (cost-)effectiveness and long term effects of dietary treatments for ADHD. www.trialregister.nl, NTR5434. Registered at October 11th, 2015.
机译:食物可能引发关注缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状。因此,消除饮食(ED)可能是患有ADHD的儿童的有效治疗方法。然而,早期的研究对于对照组的性质受到批评,潜在的混淆解释了观察到的效果,不满意的致盲,营养缺陷的潜在风险以及未知的长期和成本效益。为了解决这些问题,本文介绍了持续的两个ARM随机对照试验(RCT)的理由,研究设计和方法,比较了消除饮食和健康的短期(5?周)和长期(1?年)效果饮食与常常(CAU)相比,在adhd的儿童中。总共N?=?162个儿童(5-12?年)与ADHD将被随机化为ED或健康的饮食。包括N?= 60名儿童单独用CAU治疗(例如药物)的比较器手臂用于比较两种膳食组中发现的影响。这两个武装rct是在荷兰的两个青年精神病学中心进行,每个参与中心内随机化。主要结果措施是对定义的治疗响应,定义为a≥α≥?30%的ADHD DSM-5评级(SWAN)和/或情绪失调评级规模(SDQ:Dysregulatulation简介)。这是在饮食治疗的5周后评估,之后参与者继续饮食。二次结果措施包括破坏性行为诊断观察时间表(DB-DOS),父母和教师评级合并症状,认知评估(例如执行职能),学校运作,物理测量(例如重量),电机活动,睡眠模式,食品消费,营养营养质量,依从性,父母健康,使用医疗保健资源和成本效益。评估在研究开始时进行(T0),五周(T1),四个月(T2),八个月(T3)和12个月治疗(T4)。 T0,T1和T4评估在一个精神科的中心进行。 T2和T3评估包括仅由父母填写在线问卷。该RCT可能通过洞察洞察可行性,营养质量(成本)效果和饮食治疗对ADHD饮食治疗的长期影响,对ADHD的临床实践有重大贡献。 www.trialRegister.nl,ntr5434。注册于2015年10月11日。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号