首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >A prospective observational study on trajectories and prognostic factors of mid back pain
【24h】

A prospective observational study on trajectories and prognostic factors of mid back pain

机译:中背部疼痛的轨迹和预后因素的预期观察研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Although mid back pain (MBP) is a common condition that causes significant disability, it has received little attention in research and knowledge about trajectories and prognosis of MBP is limited. The purpose of this study was to identify trajectories of MBP and baseline risk factors for an unfavorable outcome in MBP patients undergoing chiropractic treatment. This prospective-observational study analyzes outcome data of 90 adult MBP patients (mean age?=?37.0?±?14.6?years; 49 females) during one year (at baseline, after 1?week, 1?month, 3, 6 and 12?months) after start of chiropractic treatment. Patients completed an 11-point (0 to 10) numeric pain rating scale (NRS) at baseline and one week, one month, three, six and twelve months after treatment start and the Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire at all time points except baseline. To determine trajectories, clustering with the package kml (software R), a variant of k-means clustering adapted for longitudinal data, was performed using the NRS-data. The identified NRS-clusters and PGIC data after three months were tested for association with baseline variables using univariable logistic regression analyses, conditional inference trees and random forest plots. Two distinct NRS-clusters indicating a favourable (rapid improvement within one month from moderate pain to persistent minor pain or recovery after one year, 80% of patients) and an unfavourable trajectory (persistent moderate to severe pain, 20% of patients) were identified. Chronic (?3?months) pain duration at baseline significantly predicted that a patient was less likely to follow a favourable trajectory [OR?=?0.16, 95% CI?=?0.05–0.50, p?=?0.002] and to report subjective improvement after twelve months [OR?=?0.19, 95% CI?=?0.07–0.51, p?=?0.001], which was confirmed by the conditional inference tree and the random forest analyses. This prospective exploratory study identified two distinct MBP trajectories, representing a favourable and an unfavourable outcome over the course of one year after chiropractic treatment. Pain chronicity was the factor that influenced outcome measures using NRS or PGIC.
机译:虽然中间疼痛(MBP)是一种常见的条件,导致严重的残疾,但它在研究和知识中收到了很少的关注,了解MBP的轨迹和预后是有限的。本研究的目的是识别MBP患者的不利结果的MBP和基线风险因素的轨迹。这种未来观察性研究分析了90名成人MBP患者的结果数据(平均年龄?=?37.0?±14.6岁; 49女性)在一年内(在基线之后,1?周,1?月,3,6和12?几个月)开始脊椎按摩疗法后。患者在基线完成了11点(0到10)的数字疼痛评定量表(NRS),一周,一个月,三个,六个月和十二个月后,患者随时全球变革印象(PGIC)问卷基线除外点。为了确定轨迹,使用NRS数据进行适用于纵向数据的K-Means群集的群集,使用NRS数据进行聚类。使用单一的逻辑回归分析,条件推理树和随机森林图来测试鉴定的NRS-簇和PGIC数据与基线变量相关联。两种不同的NRS-群集表明有利(从中疼痛的一个月内快速改善,在一年后持续的轻微疼痛或恢复,80%的患者)和不利的轨迹(持续的中度至严重疼痛,20%的患者)被确定。基线的慢性(>?3?月)疼痛持续时间显着预测,患者不太可能遵循有利的轨迹[或α= 0.16,95%ci?= 0.05-0.50,p?= 0.002]和到报告十二个月后的主观改善[或?= 0.19,95%CI?= 0.07-0.51,p?= 0.001],由条件推理树和随机森林分析确认。该前瞻性探索研究确定了两个不同的MBP轨迹,在脊椎按摩疗法治疗后一年内代表有利和不利的结果。疼痛慢性是利用NRS或PGIC影响结果措施的因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号